Enable EFT decomposition in decay syntax and Madspin?
Dear experts,
I know there have been several tickets open in the past about the "squared amplitude constraints are not supported" error when using EFT models in MadGraph and MadSpin. I would like to understand exactly what the underlying issue is and whether it can be solved - indeed this would be tremendously helpful to a number of our colleagues! The baseline argument for allowing EFT decomposition would bring up the computing costs associated with generating the same (well-known) SM terms multiple times and the need for an efficient sampling of the Wilson coefficient phase-space in the context of LHC precision measurements and the efforts towards global EFT fits.
To give some concrete examples, the following syntax is not allowed for the generation of the linear (SM/BSM interference) term only in a dileptonic ttbar process (with the insertion done in the ttbar production):
import dim6top_LO_UFO
generate p p > t t~ QCD<=2 QED=0 FCNC=0 DIM6=1 DIM6^2==1, (t > w+ b FCNC=0 DIM6=0, w+ > l+ vl FCNC=0 DIM6=0), (t~ > w- b~ FCNC=0 DIM6=0, w- > l- vl~ FCNC=0 DIM6=0)
The following is however possible:
generate p p > t t~ QCD<=2 QED=0 FCNC=0 DIM6=1 DIM6^2==1
but if I try to run MadSpin to get the decay products of the tops (pure SM, no EFT insertion), it implicitly builds up the previous generate command and complains again.
In an old ticket (https:/
1) run "generate p p > t t~ QCD<=2 QED=0 FCNC=0 DIM6=1 DIM6^2==1"
2) edit the LHE file and proc card to remove the problematic dim6 syntax (and thus trick MadSpin into believing it's dealing with a SM ttbar process)
3) run "./bin/madevent" and "decay_events" to use MadSpin as usual
This trick seems to work and produce a reasonable (within uncertainties) result, but clearly doesn't apply to EFT insertions in the decay of the tops, where one goes back to the complaint about constraints on squared amplitudes.
Another alternative would be:
generate p p > t t~ > b b~ l+ l- vl vl~ QCD<=2 QED=4 FCNC=0 DIM6=1 DIM6^2==1
but as I understand it, this syntax makes the tops resonant and the top width independent of EFT contributions, and therefore might lead to unphysical results...
Could you therefore comment on the plans for squared amplitude constraints in MadSpin and recommendations for achieving a consistent EFT decomposition without them in the meantime?
Thanks for your help,
Baptiste
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Answered
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Last query:
- Last reply:
Can you help with this problem?
Provide an answer of your own, or ask Baptiste Ravina for more information if necessary.