MadEvent MSSM param card calculator is not working
I have been trying to use the MadEvent MSSM param card calculator where I provide a leshouches spectrum to receive a param card but it seems not to be working. lha file is created with suspect2.
The error I am receiving is like the following:
Generation failed
The resulting /var/www/
Click the "backwards" button in you browser and correct the error.
Thanks in advance
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Answered
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Last query:
- Last reply:
Revision history for this message
|
#1 |
Hi,
Since we have move to support SLHA2 we do not use such calculator anymore.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:37, Damian <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> New question #685716 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https:/
>
> I have been trying to use the MadEvent MSSM param card calculator where I provide a leshouches spectrum to receive a param card but it seems not to be working. lha file is created with suspect2.
> The error I am receiving is like the following:
>
> Generation failed
>
> The resulting /var/www/
> Click the "backwards" button in you browser and correct the error.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
Revision history for this message
|
#2 |
Thanks Olivier for your prompt reply. Do you know if there is any other way to produce the paramcard from the output file of the suspect2?
Revision history for this message
|
#3 |
what format is provided by suspect2?
If this is SLHA2, then you do not need a converter
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 10 Nov 2019, at 13:19, Damian <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #685716 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Damian posted a new comment:
> Thanks Olivier for your prompt reply. Do you know if there is any other
> way to produce the paramcard from the output file of the suspect2?
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
Revision history for this message
|
#4 |
I guess it is not a slha2 format. I'm attaching an example of the output from suspect2.
#
# =======
# | SuSpect 2.43 OUTPUT |
# =======
#
#
# -------
# | SUSY Les Houches Accord - MSSM Spectrum |
# | |
# | SuSpect 2.43 |
# | |
# | Authors: A.Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka |
# | Ref.: hep-ph/0211331 |
# | |
# -------
#
#
BLOCK SPINFO # Spectrum Program information
1 SuSpect # RGE +Spectrum calculator
2 2.43 # version number
# nothing to signal: output a priori reliable
#
BLOCK MODSEL # Model selection
1 0 #general MSSM low scale
#
BLOCK MINPAR # Input parameters
BLOCK EXTPAR # Input parameters
0 4.65294922E+03 # EWSB scale
1 1.14000000E+00 # M_1
2 2.18900000E+02 # M_2
3 8.75507000E+02 # M_3
11 -1.00000000E+03 # A_t
12 -1.00000000E+03 # A_b
13 -2.51737263E+03 # A_tau
14 -6.77437438E+03 # A_u
15 -8.59633345E+03 # A_d
16 -2.53493493E+03 # A_e
23 3.40045685E+02 # mu(EWSB)
25 1.00000000E+01 # tanbeta(in)
26 1.57083890E+03 # MA_pole
31 1.49000000E+03 # M_eL
32 1.49000000E+03 # M_muL
33 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauL
34 1.49000000E+03 # M_eR
35 1.49000000E+03 # M_muR
36 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauR
41 9.27800000E+02 # M_q1L
42 9.27800000E+02 # M_q2L
43 9.30000000E+02 # M_q3L
44 9.26780000E+02 # M_uR
45 9.26780000E+02 # M_cR
46 9.30000000E+02 # M_tR
47 9.28000000E+02 # M_dR
48 9.13000000E+02 # M_sR
49 9.30000000E+02 # M_bR
#
BLOCK SMINPUTS # Standard Model inputs
1 1.27934000E+02 # alpha_em^
2 1.16639000E-05 # G_F [GeV^-2]
3 1.17200000E-01 # alpha_S(M_Z)^MSbar
4 9.11870000E+01 # M_Z pole mass
5 4.25000000E+00 # mb(mb)^MSbar
6 1.75000000E+02 # mt pole mass
7 1.77700000E+00 # mtau pole mass
#
BLOCK MASS # Mass Spectrum
# PDG code mass particle
24 8.04920884E+01 # W+
25 1.16225813E+02 # h
35 1.57093859E+03 # H
36 1.57083890E+03 # A
37 1.57327533E+03 # H+
5 4.87884274E+00 # b pole mass calculated from mb(mb)_MSbar
1000001 1.00452384E+03 # ~d_L
2000001 1.00340464E+03 # ~d_R
1000002 1.00160100E+03 # ~u_L
2000002 1.00133846E+03 # ~u_R
1000003 1.00452384E+03 # ~s_L
2000003 1.00340464E+03 # ~s_R
1000004 1.00160100E+03 # ~c_L
2000004 1.00133846E+03 # ~c_R
1000005 1.00100372E+03 # ~b_1
2000005 1.01075695E+03 # ~b_2
1000006 8.85905668E+02 # ~t_1
2000006 1.05989090E+03 # ~t_2
1000011 1.49067066E+03 # ~e_L
2000011 1.49064142E+03 # ~e_R
1000012 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_eL
1000013 1.49067066E+03 # ~mu_L
2000013 1.49064142E+03 # ~mu_R
1000014 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_muL
1000015 1.48729040E+03 # ~tau_1
2000015 1.49401615E+03 # ~tau_2
1000016 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_tauL
1000021 1.01198384E+03 # ~g
1000022 -2.95974745E-01 # ~chi_10
1000023 2.06140070E+02 # ~chi_20
1000025 -3.46660327E+02 # ~chi_30
1000035 3.69962658E+02 # ~chi_40
1000024 2.05993797E+02 # ~chi_1+
1000037 3.70766597E+02 # ~chi_2+
#
BLOCK SU_LOWPAR # Values constrained by exp data
1 5.13560770E-05 # Delta rho parameter
2 1.47845509E-10 # g_mu -2
3 3.04456850E-04 # Br(b -> s gamma)
#
BLOCK SU_FINETUNE # Fine-tuning info: fine-tuned if >>1
1 2.89515645E+01 # delta mZ^2/mZ^2 (mu^2)
2 1.14331572E+01 # delta mZ^2/mZ^2 (B.mu)
3 1.44766772E+01 # delta mt/mt (mu^2)
4 5.70647758E+00 # delta mt/mt (B.mu)
#
BLOCK NMIX # Neutralino Mixing Matrix
1 1 9.91345798E-01 # N_11
1 2 -9.27887581E-03 # N_12
1 3 1.30233917E-01 # N_13
1 4 -1.36579184E-02 # N_14
2 1 5.58632346E-02 # N_21
2 2 9.12630926E-01 # N_22
2 3 -3.36600178E-01 # N_23
2 4 2.25131989E-01 # N_24
3 1 8.05793052E-02 # N_31
3 2 -8.56565502E-02 # N_32
3 3 -6.93970113E-01 # N_33
3 4 -7.10334719E-01 # N_34
4 1 8.72913732E-02 # N_41
4 2 -3.99601866E-01 # N_42
4 3 -6.23012784E-01 # N_43
4 4 6.66748555E-01 # N_44
#
BLOCK UMIX # Chargino Mixing Matrix U
1 1 -8.78999690E-01 # U_11
1 2 4.76822340E-01 # U_12
2 1 4.76822340E-01 # U_21
2 2 8.78999690E-01 # U_22
#
BLOCK VMIX # Chargino Mixing Matrix V
1 1 -9.47108206E-01 # V_11
1 2 3.20914391E-01 # V_12
2 1 3.20914391E-01 # V_21
2 2 9.47108206E-01 # V_22
#
BLOCK STOPMIX # Stop Mixing Matrix
1 1 6.04176753E-01 # cos(theta_t)
1 2 7.96850332E-01 # sin(theta_t)
2 1 -7.96850332E-01 # -sin(theta_t)
2 2 6.04176753E-01 # cos(theta_t)
#
BLOCK SBOTMIX # Sbottom Mixing Matrix
1 1 6.58298996E-01 # cos(theta_b)
1 2 7.52756556E-01 # sin(theta_b)
2 1 -7.52756556E-01 # -sin(theta_b)
2 2 6.58298996E-01 # cos(theta_b)
#
BLOCK STAUMIX # Stau Mixing Matrix
1 1 7.05568059E-01 # cos(theta_tau)
1 2 7.08642162E-01 # sin(theta_tau)
2 1 -7.08642162E-01 # -sin(theta_tau)
2 2 7.05568059E-01 # cos(theta_tau)
#
BLOCK ALPHA # Higgs mixing
#
BLOCK HMIX Q= 4.65294922E+03 # DRbar Higgs Parameters
1 3.40045685E+02 # mu(Q)
2 9.45782132E+00 # tanbeta(Q)
3 2.40835601E+02 # vev(Q)
4 2.31293284E+06 # MA^2(Q)
#
BLOCK GAUGE Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The gauge couplings
1 3.67190185E-01 # gprime(Q) DRbar
2 6.45585931E-01 # g(Q) DRbar
3 1.02579784E+00 # g_3(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Au Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
1 1 -6.77437438E+03 # A_u(Q) DRbar
2 2 -6.77437438E+03 # A_c(Q) DRbar
3 3 -1.00000000E+03 # A_t(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Ad Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
1 1 -8.59633345E+03 # A_d(Q) DRbar
2 2 -8.59633345E+03 # A_s(Q) DRbar
3 3 -1.00000000E+03 # A_b(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Ae Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
1 1 -2.53493493E+03 # A_e(Q) DRbar
2 2 -2.53493493E+03 # A_mu(Q) DRbar
3 3 -2.51737263E+03 # A_tau(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Yu Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
3 3 8.46278888E-01 # y_top(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Yd Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
3 3 1.29831850E-01 # y_b(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK Ye Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
3 3 9.76552602E-02 # y_tau(Q) DRbar
#
BLOCK MSOFT Q= 4.65294922E+03 # soft SUSY breaking masses at the scale Q
1 1.14000000E+00 # M_1
2 2.18900000E+02 # M_2
3 8.75507000E+02 # M_3
21 2.33113825E+06 # M^2_Hd
22 4.78736196E+04 # M^2_Hu
31 1.49000000E+03 # M_eL
32 1.49000000E+03 # M_muL
33 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauL
34 1.49000000E+03 # M_eR
35 1.49000000E+03 # M_muR
36 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauR
41 9.27800000E+02 # M_q1L
42 9.27800000E+02 # M_q2L
43 9.30000000E+02 # M_q3L
44 9.26780000E+02 # M_uR
45 9.26780000E+02 # M_cR
46 9.30000000E+02 # M_tR
47 9.28000000E+02 # M_dR
48 9.28000000E+02 # M_sR
49 9.30000000E+02 # M_bR
Revision history for this message
|
#5 |
Looks like this is close to SLHA1 (but not exactly)
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 10 Nov 2019, at 14:32, Damian <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #685716 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Damian posted a new comment:
> I guess it is not a slha2 format. I'm attaching an example of the output
> from suspect2.
>
>
> #
> # =======
> # | SuSpect 2.43 OUTPUT |
> # =======
> #
> #
> # -------
> # | SUSY Les Houches Accord - MSSM Spectrum |
> # | |
> # | SuSpect 2.43 |
> # | |
> # | Authors: A.Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka |
> # | Ref.: hep-ph/0211331 |
> # | |
> # -------
> #
> #
> BLOCK SPINFO # Spectrum Program information
> 1 SuSpect # RGE +Spectrum calculator
> 2 2.43 # version number
> # nothing to signal: output a priori reliable
> #
> BLOCK MODSEL # Model selection
> 1 0 #general MSSM low scale
> #
> BLOCK MINPAR # Input parameters
> BLOCK EXTPAR # Input parameters
> 0 4.65294922E+03 # EWSB scale
> 1 1.14000000E+00 # M_1
> 2 2.18900000E+02 # M_2
> 3 8.75507000E+02 # M_3
> 11 -1.00000000E+03 # A_t
> 12 -1.00000000E+03 # A_b
> 13 -2.51737263E+03 # A_tau
> 14 -6.77437438E+03 # A_u
> 15 -8.59633345E+03 # A_d
> 16 -2.53493493E+03 # A_e
> 23 3.40045685E+02 # mu(EWSB)
> 25 1.00000000E+01 # tanbeta(in)
> 26 1.57083890E+03 # MA_pole
> 31 1.49000000E+03 # M_eL
> 32 1.49000000E+03 # M_muL
> 33 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauL
> 34 1.49000000E+03 # M_eR
> 35 1.49000000E+03 # M_muR
> 36 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauR
> 41 9.27800000E+02 # M_q1L
> 42 9.27800000E+02 # M_q2L
> 43 9.30000000E+02 # M_q3L
> 44 9.26780000E+02 # M_uR
> 45 9.26780000E+02 # M_cR
> 46 9.30000000E+02 # M_tR
> 47 9.28000000E+02 # M_dR
> 48 9.13000000E+02 # M_sR
> 49 9.30000000E+02 # M_bR
> #
> BLOCK SMINPUTS # Standard Model inputs
> 1 1.27934000E+02 # alpha_em^
> 2 1.16639000E-05 # G_F [GeV^-2]
> 3 1.17200000E-01 # alpha_S(M_Z)^MSbar
> 4 9.11870000E+01 # M_Z pole mass
> 5 4.25000000E+00 # mb(mb)^MSbar
> 6 1.75000000E+02 # mt pole mass
> 7 1.77700000E+00 # mtau pole mass
> #
> BLOCK MASS # Mass Spectrum
> # PDG code mass particle
> 24 8.04920884E+01 # W+
> 25 1.16225813E+02 # h
> 35 1.57093859E+03 # H
> 36 1.57083890E+03 # A
> 37 1.57327533E+03 # H+
> 5 4.87884274E+00 # b pole mass calculated from mb(mb)_MSbar
> 1000001 1.00452384E+03 # ~d_L
> 2000001 1.00340464E+03 # ~d_R
> 1000002 1.00160100E+03 # ~u_L
> 2000002 1.00133846E+03 # ~u_R
> 1000003 1.00452384E+03 # ~s_L
> 2000003 1.00340464E+03 # ~s_R
> 1000004 1.00160100E+03 # ~c_L
> 2000004 1.00133846E+03 # ~c_R
> 1000005 1.00100372E+03 # ~b_1
> 2000005 1.01075695E+03 # ~b_2
> 1000006 8.85905668E+02 # ~t_1
> 2000006 1.05989090E+03 # ~t_2
> 1000011 1.49067066E+03 # ~e_L
> 2000011 1.49064142E+03 # ~e_R
> 1000012 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_eL
> 1000013 1.49067066E+03 # ~mu_L
> 2000013 1.49064142E+03 # ~mu_R
> 1000014 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_muL
> 1000015 1.48729040E+03 # ~tau_1
> 2000015 1.49401615E+03 # ~tau_2
> 1000016 1.48868705E+03 # ~nu_tauL
> 1000021 1.01198384E+03 # ~g
> 1000022 -2.95974745E-01 # ~chi_10
> 1000023 2.06140070E+02 # ~chi_20
> 1000025 -3.46660327E+02 # ~chi_30
> 1000035 3.69962658E+02 # ~chi_40
> 1000024 2.05993797E+02 # ~chi_1+
> 1000037 3.70766597E+02 # ~chi_2+
> #
> BLOCK SU_LOWPAR # Values constrained by exp data
> 1 5.13560770E-05 # Delta rho parameter
> 2 1.47845509E-10 # g_mu -2
> 3 3.04456850E-04 # Br(b -> s gamma)
> #
> BLOCK SU_FINETUNE # Fine-tuning info: fine-tuned if >>1
> 1 2.89515645E+01 # delta mZ^2/mZ^2 (mu^2)
> 2 1.14331572E+01 # delta mZ^2/mZ^2 (B.mu)
> 3 1.44766772E+01 # delta mt/mt (mu^2)
> 4 5.70647758E+00 # delta mt/mt (B.mu)
> #
> BLOCK NMIX # Neutralino Mixing Matrix
> 1 1 9.91345798E-01 # N_11
> 1 2 -9.27887581E-03 # N_12
> 1 3 1.30233917E-01 # N_13
> 1 4 -1.36579184E-02 # N_14
> 2 1 5.58632346E-02 # N_21
> 2 2 9.12630926E-01 # N_22
> 2 3 -3.36600178E-01 # N_23
> 2 4 2.25131989E-01 # N_24
> 3 1 8.05793052E-02 # N_31
> 3 2 -8.56565502E-02 # N_32
> 3 3 -6.93970113E-01 # N_33
> 3 4 -7.10334719E-01 # N_34
> 4 1 8.72913732E-02 # N_41
> 4 2 -3.99601866E-01 # N_42
> 4 3 -6.23012784E-01 # N_43
> 4 4 6.66748555E-01 # N_44
> #
> BLOCK UMIX # Chargino Mixing Matrix U
> 1 1 -8.78999690E-01 # U_11
> 1 2 4.76822340E-01 # U_12
> 2 1 4.76822340E-01 # U_21
> 2 2 8.78999690E-01 # U_22
> #
> BLOCK VMIX # Chargino Mixing Matrix V
> 1 1 -9.47108206E-01 # V_11
> 1 2 3.20914391E-01 # V_12
> 2 1 3.20914391E-01 # V_21
> 2 2 9.47108206E-01 # V_22
> #
> BLOCK STOPMIX # Stop Mixing Matrix
> 1 1 6.04176753E-01 # cos(theta_t)
> 1 2 7.96850332E-01 # sin(theta_t)
> 2 1 -7.96850332E-01 # -sin(theta_t)
> 2 2 6.04176753E-01 # cos(theta_t)
> #
> BLOCK SBOTMIX # Sbottom Mixing Matrix
> 1 1 6.58298996E-01 # cos(theta_b)
> 1 2 7.52756556E-01 # sin(theta_b)
> 2 1 -7.52756556E-01 # -sin(theta_b)
> 2 2 6.58298996E-01 # cos(theta_b)
> #
> BLOCK STAUMIX # Stau Mixing Matrix
> 1 1 7.05568059E-01 # cos(theta_tau)
> 1 2 7.08642162E-01 # sin(theta_tau)
> 2 1 -7.08642162E-01 # -sin(theta_tau)
> 2 2 7.05568059E-01 # cos(theta_tau)
> #
> BLOCK ALPHA # Higgs mixing
> -1.06222491E-01 # Mixing angle in the neutral Higgs boson sector
> #
> BLOCK HMIX Q= 4.65294922E+03 # DRbar Higgs Parameters
> 1 3.40045685E+02 # mu(Q)
> 2 9.45782132E+00 # tanbeta(Q)
> 3 2.40835601E+02 # vev(Q)
> 4 2.31293284E+06 # MA^2(Q)
> #
> BLOCK GAUGE Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The gauge couplings
> 1 3.67190185E-01 # gprime(Q) DRbar
> 2 6.45585931E-01 # g(Q) DRbar
> 3 1.02579784E+00 # g_3(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Au Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
> 1 1 -6.77437438E+03 # A_u(Q) DRbar
> 2 2 -6.77437438E+03 # A_c(Q) DRbar
> 3 3 -1.00000000E+03 # A_t(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Ad Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
> 1 1 -8.59633345E+03 # A_d(Q) DRbar
> 2 2 -8.59633345E+03 # A_s(Q) DRbar
> 3 3 -1.00000000E+03 # A_b(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Ae Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The trilinear couplings
> 1 1 -2.53493493E+03 # A_e(Q) DRbar
> 2 2 -2.53493493E+03 # A_mu(Q) DRbar
> 3 3 -2.51737263E+03 # A_tau(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Yu Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
> 3 3 8.46278888E-01 # y_top(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Yd Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
> 3 3 1.29831850E-01 # y_b(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK Ye Q= 4.65294922E+03 # The Yukawa couplings
> 3 3 9.76552602E-02 # y_tau(Q) DRbar
> #
> BLOCK MSOFT Q= 4.65294922E+03 # soft SUSY breaking masses at the scale Q
> 1 1.14000000E+00 # M_1
> 2 2.18900000E+02 # M_2
> 3 8.75507000E+02 # M_3
> 21 2.33113825E+06 # M^2_Hd
> 22 4.78736196E+04 # M^2_Hu
> 31 1.49000000E+03 # M_eL
> 32 1.49000000E+03 # M_muL
> 33 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauL
> 34 1.49000000E+03 # M_eR
> 35 1.49000000E+03 # M_muR
> 36 1.49000000E+03 # M_tauR
> 41 9.27800000E+02 # M_q1L
> 42 9.27800000E+02 # M_q2L
> 43 9.30000000E+02 # M_q3L
> 44 9.26780000E+02 # M_uR
> 45 9.26780000E+02 # M_cR
> 46 9.30000000E+02 # M_tR
> 47 9.28000000E+02 # M_dR
> 48 9.28000000E+02 # M_sR
> 49 9.30000000E+02 # M_bR
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
Can you help with this problem?
Provide an answer of your own, or ask Damian for more information if necessary.