cross section result
Dear experts,
I have started to use MadGraph recently and I have a question about the cross section result that I found using the physics process
p p > z > l+ l-. I found the following result and have three questions about this.
1-) Is this cross section result with the Branching fractions?
2-) How should I add the errors to this result. I mean how the errors affect the result. Is it like, for example, scale variation error = 1188*13.2/100 = 156. Is this correct?
3-) What are the last four parameters "dynamical schemes". Should I include them to cross section result?
Thanks in advance.
# original cross-section: 1188.74341263
# scale variation: +13.2% -14%
# central scheme variation: + 0% -17.2%
# PDF variation: +3.14% -3.14%
#
# dynamical scheme # 1 : 1152.19 +13.8% -14.6% # \sum ET
# dynamical scheme # 2 : 1152.19 +13.8% -14.6% # \sum\sqrt{m^2+pt^2}
# dynamical scheme # 3 : 984.369 +17% -17.7% # 0.5 \sum\sqrt{m^2+pt^2}
# dynamical scheme # 4 : 1188.74 +13.2% -14% # \sqrt{\hat s}
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- kamuran
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply:
Revision history for this message
|
#1 |
Hi,
> 1-) Is this cross section result with the Branching fractions?
Only MadSpin use the information about the branching ratio (and therefore the narrow-width approximation NWA)
So in that case, we do not use the NWA and branching fractions but off course your cross-section should be close to the cross-section of p p > Z times the associated branching fraction.
(If we forget about the fact that you have cut on the lepton which means that you can not use the branching fraction anyway)
> 2-) How should I add the errors to this result. I mean how the errors affect the result. Is it like, for example, scale variation error = 1188*13.2/100 = 156. Is this correct?
If you look at the HTML page, you have a link call systematics.
On the linked file, you have the absolute cross-section for all the systemtatics variation one by one.
So you do not have to use the % if you do not want to.
> 3-) What are the last four parameters "dynamical schemes". Should I include them to cross section result?
The definition of each of them are put on the right. Those correspond to 4 different way to compute at which scale alpha_s has to be evaluated.
Typically this is not include in the theoretical uncertainty, but if you have very big change between those value (higher than the scale variation) then this is something really important.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 08:27, kamuran <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> New question #536933 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https:/
>
> Dear experts,
>
> I have started to use MadGraph recently and I have a question about the cross section result that I found using the physics process
> p p > z > l+ l-. I found the following result and have three questions about this.
>
> 1-) Is this cross section result with the Branching fractions?
> 2-) How should I add the errors to this result. I mean how the errors affect the result. Is it like, for example, scale variation error = 1188*13.2/100 = 156. Is this correct?
> 3-) What are the last four parameters "dynamical schemes". Should I include them to cross section result?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> # original cross-section: 1188.74341263
>
> # scale variation: +13.2% -14%
>
> # central scheme variation: + 0% -17.2%
>
> # PDF variation: +3.14% -3.14%
>
> #
>
> # dynamical scheme # 1 : 1152.19 +13.8% -14.6% # \sum ET
>
> # dynamical scheme # 2 : 1152.19 +13.8% -14.6% # \sum\sqrt{m^2+pt^2}
>
> # dynamical scheme # 3 : 984.369 +17% -17.7% # 0.5 \sum\sqrt{m^2+pt^2}
>
> # dynamical scheme # 4 : 1188.74 +13.2% -14% # \sqrt{\hat s}
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
Revision history for this message
|
#2 |
Hi Oliver,
Thank you for replying. Your answers were really helpful. I have one more question. MadGraph only do NLO correction. Is that right? Is there a way to do NNLO correction using MadGraph?
Best,
Kamuran
Revision history for this message
|
#3 |
We do not support NNLO indeed.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 15:14, kamuran <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #536933 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> kamuran posted a new comment:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Thank you for replying. Your answers were really helpful. I have one
> more question. MadGraph only do NLO correction. Is that right? Is there
> a way to do NNLO correction using MadGraph?
>
> Best,
> Kamuran
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
Revision history for this message
|
#5 |
Just to be 100% sure that you understand what you are doing.
when you ask madgraph to compute:
generate p p > z > l+ l-.
The result returned is at LO accuracy and not at NLO
Cheers,
Olivier
Revision history for this message
|
#6 |
Hi Oliver,
So, should I do if I want NLO accuracy?
Best,
Kamuran
Revision history for this message
|
#7 |
Sorry for mistyping. I mean what should I de if I want NLO accuracy?
Revision history for this message
|
#8 |
Hi,
For NLO computation, you have to add the [QCD]
for example
generate p p > l+ l- [QCD]
Cheers,
Olivier
PS: please check some tutorial as well.
Revision history for this message
|
#9 |
Dear Experts,
I tried to find NLO cross section using "generate p p > z > l+ l-[QCD]". But, I got the following error and I have no idea how to solve it. Could you please help me solve the problem.
WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0. Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
The compilation fails with the following output message:
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
run.inc:79.21:
Included at check_poles.f:48:
Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
cts_
Included at loop_num.f:37:
USE MPMODULE
1
Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1), because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o parton_
gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
Help might be found at https:/
If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at https:/
WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0. Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
The compilation fails with the following output message:
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
run.inc:79.21:
Included at check_poles.f:48:
Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
cts_
Included at loop_num.f:37:
USE MPMODULE
1
Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1), because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o parton_
gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
Help might be found at https:/
If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at https:/
WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0. Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
The compilation fails with the following output message:
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
run.inc:79.21:
Included at check_poles.f:48:
Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
cts_
Included at loop_num.f:37:
USE MPMODULE
1
Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1), because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o parton_
gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
Help might be found at https:/
If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at https:/
WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0. Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
The compilation fails with the following output message:
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
check_
1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
run.inc:79.21:
Included at check_poles.f:48:
Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
cts_
Included at loop_num.f:37:
USE MPMODULE
1
Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1), because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o parton_
gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
Help might be found at https:/
If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at https:/
WARNING: Fail to compile the Subprocesses
INFO:
INFO: Checking test output:
INFO: P0_uux_z_epem
INFO: Result for test_ME:
INFO: Passed.
INFO: Result for test_MC:
INFO: Passed.
INFO: Result for check_poles:
Command "launch auto " interrupted with error:
IOError : [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/
Please report this bug on https:/
More information is found in '/Users/
Please attach this file to your report.
Revision history for this message
|
#10 |
The error suggests that the problem comes from the fact that CutTools (a
loop-reduction library used by MadLoop, the part of MG5_aMC responsible for
computing the loop matrix elements) was compiled with a different compiler
that the one that is currently active on your system.
You can fix this simply by going to
<MG5_aMC_
and type
make clean
make
However, it is possible that you have other dependencies that have been
compiled with an earlier version of your compiler suite and a similar
problem as the one you encountered here could happen again.
I would therefore advise you, after any change of compiler, to restart from
a scratch version of MG5_aMC and reinstall all necessary dependencies
(LHAPDF, Pythia, NINJA, COLLIER, etc...) using the 'install' command of
MG5_aMC and with the new compiler active.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:02 AM, kamuran <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> Question #536933 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> kamuran posted a new comment:
> Dear Experts,
>
> I tried to find NLO cross section using "generate p p > z > l+ l-[QCD]".
> But, I got the following error and I have no idea how to solve it. Could
> you please help me solve the problem.
>
> WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0.
> Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
> A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
> Softwares/
> The compilation fails with the following output message:
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> run.inc:79.21:
> Included at check_poles.f:48:
>
> common/to_rwgt/ do_rwgt_scale, rw_Fscale_down, rw_Fscale_up,
> rw_Rscale_do
> 1
> Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON
> 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
> rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
> gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> -o polynomial.o
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> cts_mprec.h:1.9:
> Included at loop_num.f:37:
>
> USE MPMODULE
> 1
> Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1),
> because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
> make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
> gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o
> parton_
> fks_inc_chooser.o leshouche_
> born.o sborn_sf.o b_sf_001.o fks_Sij.o trapfpe.o
> fastjetfortran_
> veto_xsec.o montecarlocounter.o reweight_xsec.o boostwdir2.o
> configs_
> get_color.o FKSParamReader.o iproc_map.o MC_integer.o
> reweight_
> pythia_unlops.o recluster.o check_poles.o BinothLHA.o born_hel.o
> -L../../lib/ libMadLoop.a -lcts -liregi -L../../lib/ -ldhelas -lgeneric
> -lmodel -lpdf -lcernlib -lc++ -lc++ -mmacosx-
> gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
> make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
>
> Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
> Help might be found at https:/
> If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at
> https:/
> WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0.
> Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
> A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
> Softwares/
> The compilation fails with the following output message:
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> run.inc:79.21:
> Included at check_poles.f:48:
>
> common/to_rwgt/ do_rwgt_scale, rw_Fscale_down, rw_Fscale_up,
> rw_Rscale_do
> 1
> Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON
> 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
> rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
> gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> -o polynomial.o
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> cts_mprec.h:1.9:
> Included at loop_num.f:37:
>
> USE MPMODULE
> 1
> Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1),
> because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
> make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
> gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o
> parton_
> fks_inc_chooser.o leshouche_
> born.o sborn_sf.o b_sf_001.o fks_Sij.o trapfpe.o
> fastjetfortran_
> veto_xsec.o montecarlocounter.o reweight_xsec.o boostwdir2.o
> configs_
> get_color.o FKSParamReader.o iproc_map.o MC_integer.o
> reweight_
> pythia_unlops.o recluster.o check_poles.o BinothLHA.o born_hel.o
> -L../../lib/ libMadLoop.a -lcts -liregi -L../../lib/ -ldhelas -lgeneric
> -lmodel -lpdf -lcernlib -lc++ -lc++ -mmacosx-
> gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
> make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
>
> Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
> Help might be found at https:/
> If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at
> https:/
> WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0.
> Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
> A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
> Softwares/
> The compilation fails with the following output message:
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> run.inc:79.21:
> Included at check_poles.f:48:
>
> common/to_rwgt/ do_rwgt_scale, rw_Fscale_down, rw_Fscale_up,
> rw_Rscale_do
> 1
> Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON
> 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
> rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
> gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> -o polynomial.o
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> cts_mprec.h:1.9:
> Included at loop_num.f:37:
>
> USE MPMODULE
> 1
> Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1),
> because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
> make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
> gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o
> parton_
> fks_inc_chooser.o leshouche_
> born.o sborn_sf.o b_sf_001.o fks_Sij.o trapfpe.o
> fastjetfortran_
> veto_xsec.o montecarlocounter.o reweight_xsec.o boostwdir2.o
> configs_
> get_color.o FKSParamReader.o iproc_map.o MC_integer.o
> reweight_
> pythia_unlops.o recluster.o check_poles.o BinothLHA.o born_hel.o
> -L../../lib/ libMadLoop.a -lcts -liregi -L../../lib/ -ldhelas -lgeneric
> -lmodel -lpdf -lcernlib -lc++ -lc++ -mmacosx-
> gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
> make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
>
> Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
> Help might be found at https:/
> If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at
> https:/
> WARNING: fct <function compile_dir at 0x10e4ab500> does not return 0.
> Stopping the code in a clean way. The error was:
> A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /Users/
> Softwares/
> The compilation fails with the following output message:
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> check_poles.
>
> 1 pmass_rambo, prambo)
> 1
> Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument
> 'xm' (5/100) at (1)
> run.inc:79.21:
> Included at check_poles.f:48:
>
> common/to_rwgt/ do_rwgt_scale, rw_Fscale_down, rw_Fscale_up,
> rw_Rscale_do
> 1
> Warning: Padding of 4 bytes required before 'rw_fscale_down' in COMMON
> 'to_rwgt' at (1); reorder elements or use -fno-align-commons
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> for dir in `ls -d V*`; do cd $dir; make; cd ../; done
> rm -f ../libMadLoop.a
> gfortran -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> -o polynomial.o
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> gfortran -O -fno-automatic -ffixed-
> cts_mprec.h:1.9:
> Included at loop_num.f:37:
>
> USE MPMODULE
> 1
> Fatal Error: Cannot read module file 'mpmodule.mod' opened at (1),
> because it was created by a different version of GNU Fortran
> make[1]: *** [loop_num.o] Error 1
> gfortran -o check_poles parton_lum_1.o parton_lum_2.o parton_lum_3.o
> parton_
> fks_inc_chooser.o leshouche_
> born.o sborn_sf.o b_sf_001.o fks_Sij.o trapfpe.o
> fastjetfortran_
> veto_xsec.o montecarlocounter.o reweight_xsec.o boostwdir2.o
> configs_
> get_color.o FKSParamReader.o iproc_map.o MC_integer.o
> reweight_
> pythia_unlops.o recluster.o check_poles.o BinothLHA.o born_hel.o
> -L../../lib/ libMadLoop.a -lcts -liregi -L../../lib/ -ldhelas -lgeneric
> -lmodel -lpdf -lcernlib -lc++ -lc++ -mmacosx-
> gfortran: error: libMadLoop.a: No such file or directory
> make: *** [check_poles] Error 1
>
> Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
> Help might be found at https:/
> If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at
> https:/
> WARNING: Fail to compile the Subprocesses
> INFO:
>
> INFO: Checking test output:
> INFO: P0_uux_z_epem
> INFO: Result for test_ME:
> INFO: Passed.
> INFO: Result for test_MC:
> INFO: Passed.
> INFO: Result for check_poles:
> Command "launch auto " interrupted with error:
> IOError : [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/
> Softwares/
> Please report this bug on https:/
> More information is found in '/Users/
> Softwares/
> Please attach this file to your report.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
--
Valentin
Revision history for this message
|
#11 |
Hi Valentin,
This solved the issue. Thanks.