ggF for large Higgs Mass

Asked by Felix Kling

Hi,

I want to generate the LO gluon gluon fusion cross section for large Higgs masses (mH>mt). If I use the the heft-model file gives me cross section that start to increase again for mH>mt instead of decreasing.

Here are the Madgraph Input that I have used:
   import model heft
   generate g g > h
   output ggH
Afterwards I changed the Higgs mass in the param_card.dat to the mass I want.

These are the results I obtained for a 100 TeV machine (same problem for 14 TeV):
mH[GeV] XSection[pb] for gg>h
100 565.27
200 229.22
300 153.22
400 150.26
600 413.99
800 2366.7
1000 13793.0

Obviously the large mass behaviour is wrong. Do you know what I am doing wrong and how I can fix this problem?

Thank you for your help!

Felix

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Olivier Mattelaer
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Best Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#1

Hi,

The model heft is valid in the limit m_h/(2mt) < 1, since it correspond to the (first term of the ) Taylor Expansion in that parameter.
Physically, it means that you start to probe the loop and therefore you need an accurate representation of the loop.

So you really need to integrate the loop-induced process. Such computation are not (yet) available in our framework.
We are actively working on having such computation public but we still need to improve stability for complicated processes.

The next major revision of MG5_aMC will be able to handle this kind of process.

Cheers,

Olivier

On 28 Jan 2015, at 23:36, Felix Kling <email address hidden> wrote:

> New question #261366 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo/+question/261366
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to generate the LO gluon gluon fusion cross section for large Higgs masses (mH>mt). If I use the the heft-model file gives me cross section that start to increase again for mH>mt instead of decreasing.
>
> Here are the Madgraph Input that I have used:
> import model heft
> generate g g > h
> output ggH
> Afterwards I changed the Higgs mass in the param_card.dat to the mass I want.
>
> These are the results I obtained for a 100 TeV machine (same problem for 14 TeV):
> mH[GeV] XSection[pb] for gg>h
> 100 565.27
> 200 229.22
> 300 153.22
> 400 150.26
> 600 413.99
> 800 2366.7
> 1000 13793.0
>
> Obviously the large mass behaviour is wrong. Do you know what I am doing wrong and how I can fix this problem?
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> Felix
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.

Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#2

For information this is the number that I get with this (not public) loop-induced module

For 100TeV
100: 0.4320E+03 +- 0.1963E+01
200: 193.5 ± 0.074
300: 138.1 ± 0.058
400: 170.7 ± 0.078 ( larger due to the 2*mt threshold)
600: 55.09 ± 0.024
800: 17.42 +- 0.007898
1000: 6.512 ± 0.0024

Thanks a lot, this allow to find a bug in this new module which was preventing the module to make the scan over model parameter.

If you want to have access to the code which generated the number above, please send me an email.

Cheers,

Olivier

Revision history for this message
Felix Kling (kling-c) said :
#3

Thanks Olivier Mattelaer, that solved my question.