branch stuck on scanning revisions

Asked by Philip Muškovac

https://code.launchpad.net/~neon/kdewebdev/trunk is stuck at "Updating branch..." for several weeks now, there hasn't been much activity lately, and looking at the branch content the last commit is there, but the launchpad UI seems stuck.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Launchpad itself Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Philip Muškovac
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Max Bowsher (maxb) said :
#1

To those investigating this issue: See also https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/142142 for another branch which is not being scanned.

Revision history for this message
Max Bowsher (maxb) said :
#2
Revision history for this message
Max Bowsher (maxb) said :
#3

Gah, I clicked the wrong button. Can someone re-open this question please :-)

Revision history for this message
Curtis Hovey (sinzui) said :
#4

Wrong button was used.

Revision history for this message
Ursula Junque (ursinha) said :
#5

Hi Max and Philip,

Both branches, https://code.launchpad.net/~neon/kdewebdev/trunk and https://code.launchpad.net/~ifolder-dev/ifolder/trunk, report they were scanned successfully 4 hours ago. I've requested the import again for both just in case.

Could you confirm things are working as supposed now, please?

Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Max Bowsher (maxb) said :
#6

The ifolder branch looks happy now. The kdewebdev one is currently still displaying "Updating branch..." an hour after the last import run, i.e. it is still stuck.

Revision history for this message
Julian Edwards (julian-edwards) said :
#7

question is still open

Revision history for this message
Curtis Hovey (sinzui) said :
#8

I think the correct answer here is that the branch is a victim of bug 671314.

Revision history for this message
Max Bowsher (maxb) said :
#9

The branches mentioned within this question thread both appear to have unstuck themselves.

Revision history for this message
Philip Muškovac (yofel) said :
#10

Seems so, thanks for looking at it.