Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic

Bug #317564 reported by Craig
74
This bug affects 7 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
subversion (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Anders Kaseorg
Nominated for Jaunty by levmatta
Nominated for Karmic by Andrew Snare

Bug Description

Binary package hint: subversion

Subversion 1.5.5 is a minor bug fix release. It is already in Debian experimental - can it please be included in Jaunty?

http://packages.debian.org/experimental/subversion

http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.5.5/CHANGES

Thanks!

Bug description is outdated, now the current Version is 1.6.2 with a new repo and wc format an much better performance and lots of bugfixes (grizzly)! Please provide a way to at least _choose_ what subversion to install (such as the old apache 1.3 vs. 2.x series decision was possible a long time in most distros and may be still)

(Bug description originally requested inclusion in Jaunty, which has shipped.)

Revision history for this message
Martin Nowack (martin-nowack) wrote :

Additionally, the merge feature introduced with 1.5 has some bugs and therefore are quite useless.
1.5.5/6 fixes many of them.

Revision history for this message
amichair (amichai2) wrote :

How about 1.6.0?

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote :

How about 1.6.1 - at work, on windows, I always have the latest slik-svn and tortoissvn with easy popup update notification. Now I have upgraded to 1.6.1 all my repos and can't use them on linux any more...
But 1.6.1 is so cool - it can pack every "slice" (usually 1000 revisions) of a repo into just one optimised file with the svnadmin pack command. And its _WAY_ faster because they keep a lot of stuff no more in XML format, so says the subversion book... If git were not behind also, svn for the main repo and git-svn for an offline copy would be fine.
OK - there's also bazaar and mercural and ... but still, svn is enough for most scenarios and I would like to work with the most recent version to profit from innovation - if it were in jaunty proposed that would be enough OR some info how to get a ppa for .debs...

Revision history for this message
Camilo Aguilar (camilo-aguilar) wrote :

any updates about the inclusion of subversion 1.6.1 in ubuntu jaunty ?

Revision history for this message
Marcus Sundman (sundman) wrote :

Yes, the title should say 'upgrade to Subversion 1.6 for jaunty'.

Revision history for this message
Hendy Irawan (ceefour) wrote : apport-collect data

Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: subversion 1.5.4dfsg1-1ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

summary: - upgrade to Subversion 1.5.5 for jaunty
+ Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Jaunty 9.04
Revision history for this message
Hendy Irawan (ceefour) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote : Re: Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Jaunty 9.04

I checked out the 1.6.2 tag from http://svn.collab.net... and managed to build it via autoconfig.sh / config and checkinstall.
Now I have a fine svn 1.6.2 commandline client. However, kdesvn, nautilussvn etc. ppp all based on older 1.5-series refuse to work proberly and asking me to revert my wc's format to 1.5 series.
On good old xp at work, it is as easy as downloading slicksvn and tortoisesvn to have a nice svn-working environment with alle the benefits from 1.6 such as much faster operation, and the ability to compress every 1000 Revs into one single file.
On the other hand, git svn is poor still on xp, so I have to live with tsvn in the virtual machine and then git-ing it on linux if I want to take work with me... sad...

description: updated
description: updated
summary: - Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Jaunty 9.04
+ Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.x for Karmic
Revision history for this message
Andrew Snare (ajs-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

If this bug does make it into Karmic, bug 380849 requests the package be included in jaunty-backports.

Revision history for this message
Anders Kaseorg (andersk) wrote :

Here is a debdiff against subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1 from Debian experimental with the relevant Ubuntu changes merged in. (I also had to disable DEB_OPT_PARALLEL to work around what appears to be an upstream Makefile bug.) It should be suitable for upload to Karmic.

I have built this Karmic package, as well as backports to Jaunty, Intrepid, and Hardy, in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/subversion-1.6

Changed in subversion (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Anders Kaseorg (anders-kaseorg)
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Anders Kaseorg (andersk) wrote :

Just as a note, I’ve filed these two bugs with Debian:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531366
Upgrade to Subversion 1.6.2

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531369
subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1 fails to build with DEB_OPT_PARALLEL

Revision history for this message
Anders Kaseorg (andersk) wrote :

I asked the Debian maintainer in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531366 why 1.6.x hasn’t moved out of Debian experimental yet, and got a detailed response. The three issues he mentioned look relatively minor, and the second isn’t an issue for Ubuntu (we already disable serf because it’s in universe), but we should be aware of them and of the fact that 1.6.x in experimental might not get updates as frequently as 1.5.x in unstable would.

I think we should still get 1.6.x into Karmic; there is plenty of time to work out any remaining issues. But if we want to stay with 1.5.x for now, we should at least merge 1.5.6 from testing/unstable (debdiff in bug 382002).

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Seems Steve Langasek did the merge and update:

subversion | 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu1 | karmic | source

Changed in subversion (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.