Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

@Timo: I notice the libdrm backport drops the valgrind integration. I know it's disabled in (at least) impish, but is there any particular reason for it to be disabled in the focal backport?

It seems pretty unlikely that anyone would notice, but the diff required to keep the valgrind annotations enabled also looks small, so maybe we should?

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted xorg-server (2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

aptdaemon/1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32.3 (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#xorg-server

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

see Debian bugs

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994873
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994955

we can't keep valgrind enabled, or libdrm.pc would be broken

Well, that's a compelling reason.

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libdrm into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libdrm (2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

mir/1.7.1-0ubuntu2 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#libdrm

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

This bug was fixed in the package xorg-server - 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.2

---------------
xorg-server (2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.2) focal-security; urgency=medium

  * SECURITY UPDATE: SProcRenderCompositeGlyphs out-of-bounds access
    - debian/patches/CVE-2021-4008.patch: check lengths in render/render.c.
    - CVE-2021-4008
  * SECURITY UPDATE: SProcXFixesCreatePointerBarrier out-of-bounds access
    - debian/patches/CVE-2021-4009.patch: use sizes in xfixes/cursor.c.
    - CVE-2021-4009
  * SECURITY UPDATE: SProcScreenSaverSuspend out-of-bounds access
    - debian/patches/CVE-2021-4010.patch: fix logic in Xext/saver.c.
    - CVE-2021-4010
  * SECURITY UPDATE: SwapCreateRegister out-of-bounds access
    - debian/patches/CVE-2021-4011.patch: fix length in record/record.c.
    - CVE-2021-4011

 -- Marc Deslauriers <email address hidden> Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:14:13 -0500

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

tested on intel TGL-U, WHL, and AMD Radeon 520 Mobile, everything looks good

This bug was fixed in the package mesa - 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1

---------------
mesa (21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1949553)

mesa (21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1) impish; urgency=medium

  * New bugfix release. (LP: #1956915)
    - Enable llvm for riscv64 still, to avoid installation issues

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:28:45 +0200

This bug was fixed in the package libdrm - 2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1

---------------
libdrm (2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1949553)

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:15:14 +0200

The verification of the Stable Release Update for mesa has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.