Backport packages for 20.04.3 HWE stack

Bug #1925320 reported by Timo Aaltonen
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
directx-headers (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
libdrm (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Timo Aaltonen
llvm-toolchain-12 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
mesa (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Timo Aaltonen
xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Timo Aaltonen

Bug Description

[Impact]

These are needed for 20.04.3 images.

[Test case]

Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed and working.

[What could go wrong]

directx-headers: a new package, nothing can go wrong

libdrm: adds some new api, no changes to old stuff

llvm-12: a new package, no regression potential on it's own

mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of 21.0.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that point

xserver: a new point-release, 1.20.x series is in deep maintenance mode, so there should be little chance of breakage

Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in llvm-toolchain-12 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in mesa (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in xorg-server (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
description: updated
Changed in directx-headers (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
description: updated
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu Focal):
assignee: nobody → Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in mesa (Ubuntu Focal):
assignee: nobody → Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal):
assignee: nobody → Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libdrm into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.105-3~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Changed in directx-headers (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted directx-headers into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/1.0.2-1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted llvm-toolchain-12 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-12/1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in llvm-toolchain-12 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.1-2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in mesa (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Kai-Chuan Hsieh (kchsieh) wrote :

Try to enable proposed channel and update the libdrm and mesa on ADL-S.

The graphic works good on it.
Attach the system info.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (xorg-server/2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted xorg-server (2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

notepadqq/2.0.0~beta1-1build1 (armhf)
ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.33 (s390x, ppc64el, arm64, armhf, amd64)
apport/2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 (amd64)
bambam/1.0.1+dfsg-1 (arm64, armhf)
aptdaemon/1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32.3 (s390x, ppc64el, armhf, amd64)
libsoup2.4/2.70.0-1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#xorg-server

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted llvm-toolchain-12 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-12/1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted llvm-toolchain-12 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-12/1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Mateusz Stachowski (stachowski-mateusz) wrote :

In my case the new mesa causes graphical glitches.

It happens in Unity and Gnome Shell both X.org and Wayland sessions.

CPU:
  Info: 6-Core AMD Ryzen 5 3600 [MT MCP] speed: 3916 MHz
  min/max: 2200/3600 MHz
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Navi 10 [Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 XT]
  driver: amdgpu v: kernel
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: loaded: amdgpu,ati
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,radeon,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
  OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (NAVI10 DRM 3.35.0
  5.4.0-79-generic LLVM 12.0.0)
  v: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.3

I also have kernels from XanMod 5.12.13 and 5.13 and when using those there is the same problem.

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

did you get it with 21.0.1? it was in proposed for several weeks

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

I can't reproduce it with a Pro W5700, which is a NAVI 10 just like RX 5600 XT.

Revision history for this message
Mateusz Stachowski (stachowski-mateusz) wrote :

I've got updates for mesa 21.0.1-2 July 1st and it was upgrade from 20.2.6 which worked without such problems. Then July 2nd there was upgrade to 21.0.3-0.

I'm not sure if the problems started with 21.0.1.

Also there are programs that work without graphical glitches. Suprisingly Firefox doesn't have problems but my main webbrowser Vivaldi does. Also I was able to watch Amazon Prime using ElectronPlayer the videos display without glitches however the menus of that program do have glitches.

Also I've checked LiveCD image of Impish and there wasn't any problems with that.

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

best to file a separate bug anyway

that said, I'm not sure if this should block the updates, since I wasn't able to reproduce it with a gpu of the same family

Revision history for this message
Mateusz Stachowski (stachowski-mateusz) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package llvm-toolchain-12 - 1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.3

---------------
llvm-toolchain-12 (1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.3) focal; urgency=medium

  * control, rules: Fix build on riscv64, force gcc version to 10.
    (LP: #1925320)

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:43:21 +0300

Changed in llvm-toolchain-12 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Robie Basak (racb) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (xorg-server/2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted xorg-server (2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

bambam/1.0.1+dfsg-1 (arm64, armhf)
notepadqq/2.0.0~beta1-1build1 (armhf)
libsoup2.4/2.70.0-1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#xorg-server

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (xorg-server/2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted xorg-server (2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

gtk+3.0/3.24.20-0ubuntu1 (s390x)
notepadqq/2.0.0~beta1-1build1 (armhf)
apport/2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 (amd64)
saods9/8.1+repack-1 (amd64)
xmobar/0.29.4-2build3 (arm64)
bambam/1.0.1+dfsg-1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#xorg-server

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Mateusz Stachowski (stachowski-mateusz) wrote :

I've checked both my install and daily live image of focal.

tags: added: verification-done-focal
removed: verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

as the mesa regression in bug #1934783 is now fixed, this can be marked verified as well

tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

autopkgtests are also all green now

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package mesa - 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1

---------------
mesa (21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1925320)
  * control, rules: Use gcc10 on ppc64el to fix the build.

mesa (21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * amd-add-missing-line-from-backport.diff: Fix a regression with
    radeonsi caused by a bad backport. (LP: #1934783)

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Tue, 25 May 2021 09:51:53 +0300

Changed in mesa (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package libdrm - 2.4.105-3~20.04.1

---------------
libdrm (2.4.105-3~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1923880, #1925320)

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Wed, 19 May 2021 11:15:08 +0300

Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for mesa has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package xorg-server - 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2

---------------
xorg-server (2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2) focal; urgency=medium

  * modesetting-disable-reverse-prime-offload-udl.diff: Fix a regression
    on displaylink devices after mesa update. (LP: #1931547)

xorg-server (2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1925320)
    - don't disable building xwayland

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Tue, 06 Jul 2021 13:17:51 +0300

Changed in xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package directx-headers - 1.0.2-1~20.04.1

---------------
directx-headers (1.0.2-1~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport to focal. (LP: #1925320)

 -- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Wed, 19 May 2021 11:25:36 +0300

Changed in directx-headers (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.