SRU of LXCFS 2.0.8 (upstream bugfix release)

For bionic, we'll just sync lxcfs from Debian after I get Debian to update the packaging slightly to deal with us backporting lxcfs all the way down to trusty.

I uploaded the artful version of this, working on zesty and xenial next.

And uploaded bionic, zesty and xenial now.

The bionic upload is stuck in -proposed.

Yeah, I'll push an hint, the problem is that the lxc tests depend on Ubuntu having a cloud-image for the current series, which isn't currently true for bionic...

I approved the artful SRU but of course LP timed out when the tooling was supposed to update the bug. Doing that manually now - please test the artful-proposed packages.

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lxcfs into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-zesty to verification-done-zesty. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-zesty. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lxcfs into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

We got a report of lxcfs restarting rather than reloading with this update, we need to reproduce it to confirm but if that's the case, we'll need a follow-up upload to fix this.

A fix for this issue has been uploaded to bionic and to the queue for all SRUs.

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lxcfs into artful-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-artful to verification-done-artful. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-artful. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lxcfs into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-zesty to verification-done-zesty. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-zesty. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lxcfs into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Been running LXCFS 2.0.8 on a variety of systems for the past couple of weeks, other than the initial upgrade issue which we fixed, everything looks good.

This bug was fixed in the package lxcfs - 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2

---------------
lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Add symlink from /usr/lib/HOST-ARCH/lxcfs to /usr/lib/lxcfs.
    This is needed so that an already running lxcfs daemon can properly
    reload the internal lxcfs library on upgrade.

lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bugfix release (2.0.8) (LP: #1727373)
    - bindings: Add mountpoint for unified hierarchy
    - bindings: Calculate uptime via proc//stat
    - bindings: Revert virtualization of 'btime' field due to regressions in ps
    - doc: Update README
    - init: Add cgroupfs-mount to Should-Start/Stop sysvinit LSB headers
    - lib: Add common fallback dlopen for liblxcfs.so
    - lib: Fix the installation directory for liblxcfs to ${libdir}/lxcfs
    - pam: Add a 'all' option for -c
    - pam: Chown cgroup.procs file on unified hierarchy
    - pam: Report back when we find a unified hierarchy
    - tests: Fix invalid comparison
    - uptime: Fix a problem with subsequent reads

 -- Stéphane Graber <email address hidden> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:07:44 -0500

The verification of the Stable Release Update for lxcfs has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

This bug was fixed in the package lxcfs - 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.2

---------------
lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.2) zesty; urgency=medium

  * Add symlink from /usr/lib/HOST-ARCH/lxcfs to /usr/lib/lxcfs.
    This is needed so that an already running lxcfs daemon can properly
    reload the internal lxcfs library on upgrade.

lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bugfix release (2.0.8) (LP: #1727373)
    - bindings: Add mountpoint for unified hierarchy
    - bindings: Calculate uptime via proc//stat
    - bindings: Revert virtualization of 'btime' field due to regressions in ps
    - doc: Update README
    - init: Add cgroupfs-mount to Should-Start/Stop sysvinit LSB headers
    - lib: Add common fallback dlopen for liblxcfs.so
    - lib: Fix the installation directory for liblxcfs to ${libdir}/lxcfs
    - pam: Add a 'all' option for -c
    - pam: Chown cgroup.procs file on unified hierarchy
    - pam: Report back when we find a unified hierarchy
    - tests: Fix invalid comparison
    - uptime: Fix a problem with subsequent reads

 -- Stéphane Graber <email address hidden> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:05:33 -0500

This bug was fixed in the package lxcfs - 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.10.2

---------------
lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.10.2) artful; urgency=medium

  * Add symlink from /usr/lib/HOST-ARCH/lxcfs to /usr/lib/lxcfs.
    This is needed so that an already running lxcfs daemon can properly
    reload the internal lxcfs library on upgrade.

lxcfs (2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.10.1) artful; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bugfix release (2.0.8) (LP: #1727373)
    - bindings: Add mountpoint for unified hierarchy
    - bindings: Calculate uptime via proc//stat
    - bindings: Revert virtualization of 'btime' field due to regressions in ps
    - doc: Update README
    - init: Add cgroupfs-mount to Should-Start/Stop sysvinit LSB headers
    - lib: Add common fallback dlopen for liblxcfs.so
    - lib: Fix the installation directory for liblxcfs to ${libdir}/lxcfs
    - pam: Add a 'all' option for -c
    - pam: Chown cgroup.procs file on unified hierarchy
    - pam: Report back when we find a unified hierarchy
    - tests: Fix invalid comparison
    - uptime: Fix a problem with subsequent reads

 -- Stéphane Graber <email address hidden> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:03:40 -0500