On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:37:07PM -0000, Tyler Dinsmoor wrote:
> The reasons to why old kernels are not intentionally being marked for
> autoremoval (as of 2008-11-04) is because it was considered too
> dangerous,
No, absolutely not. The reason they're not being marked for autoremoval is
because there's a bug in the interface between update-manager and aptdaemon.
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:37:07PM -0000, Tyler Dinsmoor wrote:
> The reasons to why old kernels are not intentionally being marked for
> autoremoval (as of 2008-11-04) is because it was considered too
> dangerous,
No, absolutely not. The reason they're not being marked for autoremoval is
because there's a bug in the interface between update-manager and aptdaemon.