> On reflection I think it's best if writers say what kind of <list> they want.
Agreed.
> The command grep "<list" *.page seems useful in finding pages that may have problems.
Yes, all other uses should be checked.
I also started looking back through the doc team mail archives for related discussions, but only got to 2004 before giving up due to a high number of html e-mails that often trigger the "list" search.
@Chris: Note that it might not always be a bug if the html display differs from the Mallard specification. The whole purpose of the ubuntu.xsl file is to provide overrides to the defaults, in addition to adding some functionality.
> On reflection I think it's best if writers say what kind of <list> they want.
Agreed.
> The command grep "<list" *.page seems useful in finding pages that may have problems.
Yes, all other uses should be checked.
I also started looking back through the doc team mail archives for related discussions, but only got to 2004 before giving up due to a high number of html e-mails that often trigger the "list" search.
@Chris: Note that it might not always be a bug if the html display differs from the Mallard specification. The whole purpose of the ubuntu.xsl file is to provide overrides to the defaults, in addition to adding some functionality.