Ubuntu
qantenna package

Ubuntu 16.04 LTS version ?

Asked by Neil Wood

HI people,
      Is there a version of qantenna that will install and run on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS ?
I am having trouble finding a package for both qantenna and necpp for 16.04
apt-get does not find one.

Regards,
Neil

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Ubuntu qantenna Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Manfred Hampl
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said : 		#1

https://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/qantenna

This is in the universe repository. Make sure you have this enabled

Revision history for this message
Neil Wood (lostcrusader) said : 		#2

I did an:

sudo add-apt-repository universe

response:

'universe' distibution component is already enabled for all sources

apt-get install qantenna
E: unable to locate package qantenna

???? sorry, I can not find it

am I doing some thing wrong.

Cheers,
Neil

Revision history for this message
Neil Wood (lostcrusader) said : 		#3

Sorry, Also thank you for your help, I'm struggling to find the package.

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said : 		#4

What is the output of;

sudo apt-get update

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Best Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said : 		#5

If you look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qantenna you see that a qantenna package exists only for Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04.

The publication history states:
(From Debian) ROM; Depends on unmaintained RC buggy package, low popcon; Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763093

The "unmaintained RC buggy package" dependency probably refers to necpp, with a note in its publication history:
(From Debian) RoQA; RC buggy, dead upstream, maintainer possibly MIA; Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763120

Also necpp is only available for Ubutnu 12.04 and 14.04

Revision history for this message
Neil Wood (lostcrusader) said : 		#6

Thanks Manfred Hampl, that solved my question.