Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:55:23 +0200
From: David Pettersson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#258847: libpisock8: System serial device permissions overridden
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:43:16PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> The default choise is safe (do not change anything). If you have
> something else it is because the admin (you?) _chosed it_.
>
> Maybe the debconf question is not clear enough:
> " To ease the use of the Palm connected to the port its access rights
> will be lowered to allow access to any user. If it is a security
> problem for you, select "None" and manage the link and its access
> rights yourself. "
>
> run 'sudo dpkg-reconfigure jpilot' to see the question again.
Yes, I must have changed this myself. However, I did try running
dpkg-reconfigure on the libpisock8 package before sending the report,
but was mislead by the naming of the file. Perhaps a comment in the
libpisock8-file would be appropriate?
Thanks for pointing out my error, and for you rapid response. I think
we can close/reject this report.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:55:23 +0200
From: David Pettersson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#258847: libpisock8: System serial device permissions overridden
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:43:16PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> The default choise is safe (do not change anything). If you have
> something else it is because the admin (you?) _chosed it_.
>
> Maybe the debconf question is not clear enough:
> " To ease the use of the Palm connected to the port its access rights
> will be lowered to allow access to any user. If it is a security
> problem for you, select "None" and manage the link and its access
> rights yourself. "
>
> run 'sudo dpkg-reconfigure jpilot' to see the question again.
Yes, I must have changed this myself. However, I did try running
dpkg-reconfigure on the libpisock8 package before sending the report,
but was mislead by the naming of the file. Perhaps a comment in the
libpisock8-file would be appropriate?
Thanks for pointing out my error, and for you rapid response. I think
we can close/reject this report.
Sincerely,
--
David Pettersson