Inclusion of the packet nemo-extensions
Asked by
Tiger Beard
I wonder if there is any reason why for Ubuntu the packages
nemo-emblems
nemo-terminal
nemo-seahorse
nemo-share
are not used.
In an similar way I would kindly ask what would be against inclusion of the package
nemo-extensions
Rationale:
In Debian thsese packages are available and currently maintained. See https:/
The packages are useful extensions and make the workflow more efficient.
The "nemo-extensions" package does contain a larget set of extensions, including older versions of the above. The value of this package is to get a good overview of available extensions with a mature functionality. If newer versions
are required the single packages could easily used to upgrade.
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- For:
- Ubuntu nemo Edit question
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Tiger Beard
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply:
To post a message you must log in.