Comment 13 for bug 1023645

Revision history for this message
Thorsteinn A. Malmjursson (lightningstrike35) wrote :

You're not wrong, Roger, not by a long shot - the only reason I posted that is that it worked, so I thought of it as a secondary workaround to your workaround - I didn't mean to make it seem like it was better in any way, simply an alternative :D