Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

Bug #251344 reported by Mr Freeze
214
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Critical
Unassigned
Hardy
Fix Released
Critical
Tim Gardner

Bug Description

Downloaded 2.6.24-20-generic kernel updates today (Pre-released updates-Hardy proposed). After these packages were installed, I restarted and on boot the computer hangs after showing "Starting up..." in the upper left corner of the monitor. Others report the same problem in the Ubuntu forums.

Hardy 8.04.1 desktop-i386
Sempron 2500+ processor
Sapphire Radeon 9600XT running ATI Catalyst 8.7 driver

Packages downloaded:
linux-generic_2.6.24.20.22_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-20_2.6.24-20.37_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.37_i386.deb
linux-headers-generic_2.6.24.20.22_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.37_i386.deb
linux-image-generic_2.6.24.20.22_i386.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-20.37_i386.deb
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24.14-20.46_i386.deb
linux-restricted-modules-common_2.6.24.14-20.46_all.deb
linux-restricted-modules-generic_2.6.24.20.22_i386.deb
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.29_i386.deb

Tags: 2.6.24-20
Mr Freeze (rockula-mike)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Mark Grandi (markgrandi) wrote :

Im marking this as confirmed, as i get the same exact bug.

im also uploading a picture of what i get when i try to run in recovery mode, as it doesnt even start up far enough to start writing to the log file.

Revision history for this message
Mark Grandi (markgrandi) wrote :

and here is the forum topic about it with 5+ other people having the same problem:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5447185#post5447185

Revision history for this message
Mick Russell (debnmick) wrote :

When I try to get mine running in recovery mode it gets as far as checking for the "hlt" command, which is where it stalls.

Revision history for this message
Brandon McGlumphy (brandonmcglumphy) wrote :

Just happened to me too. I posted in the Ubuntu thread, but I'll post again.

Pentium 3 Katmai 450Mhz
Old Asus mobo (not entirely sure)
Nvidia GeForce 5200FX 256MB

Revision history for this message
Patrick Balleux (patrickballeux) wrote :

I have this problem only on my 32 bit AMD laptop (Averatec 3250)
but my Dell 1521 (AMD Turion64 x2)
and my desktop HP Presario (AMD 64 bits) do not have this problem.

Seems to be related to the 32 bits architecture and/or AMD CPU.

Revision history for this message
Benjamin Schug (bschug) wrote :

Same problem here, AMD Athlon XP 2600+.

Since this problem only seems to occur on older CPUs, could it be that this kernel package was compiled with some newer instruction set turned on, like SSE2?

Revision history for this message
nico (nicolas-pourcelot) wrote :

Same problem with AMD Sempron 3000+

Revision history for this message
none_hate (notanone) wrote :

I've got the same on AMD Athlon 1800+

Colin Watson (cjwatson)
Changed in linux:
importance: Undecided → Critical
importance: Undecided → Critical
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
ivex82 (ivex82) wrote :

after restart in grub load press esc and select 2.6.24-19-generic for startup your ubuntu

after startup and nice look of ubuntu start sinaptic and search for 2.6.24-20 ,and remove next:

Completely removed the following packages:
linux-headers-2.6.24-20
linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic

Removed the following packages:
linux-headers-2.6.24-20-generic
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-20-generic
linux-headers-generic
linux-image-generic

restart computer
(if somebody dont anderstand sorry about my bad english :) )

Revision history for this message
cirelle (gcirino) wrote :

my 2 cents AMD Athlon +2000 1GB ram PNY Verto 6200 video w/ nvidia drivers, stops at the checking hlt line in recovery mode, previous kernels still work.

Revision history for this message
Jouni Mettala (jouni-mettala) wrote :

2.6.24-20-386 and 2.6.24-19-generic both works for me but 2.6.24-20-generic hangs for me too.

Revision history for this message
Craig Maloney (craig-decafbad) wrote :

Same here, with AMD Athlon processor and NVidia chipset / video card (Gigabyte GA-7N400 Pro 2)

craig@lister:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm)
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 1094.188
cache size : 512 KB
...

Revision history for this message
jeroenl (jeroenl) wrote :

I can confirm this to. The PC hangs/freezes right after the "start up"-message.

I had to go back via the grub menu to 19.

AMS Athlon XP 2400+ with a onboard VIA S3 UniChrome

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

Same here, Sempron 2600+, last messages:

CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 256K (64 bytes/line)
Compat vDSO mapped to ffffe000.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.

Revision history for this message
Goran (goran-26) wrote :

Same problem for me to, halts after the hlt check.

goran@LUCIFER:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1503.426
cache size : 256 KB

I am using a GeForce 7600 GS if that matters.

Revision history for this message
paspartu (paspartu-0) wrote :

The same problem after kernell update
with linux 2.6.24-20 generic & linux 2.6.24-20 rt too
system:
-Computer-
Processor : AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+
Memory : 1029MB (390MB used)
Operating System : Ubuntu 8.04.1
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : GeForce FX 5200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : ICH - SiS SI7012

Revision history for this message
Marcelo Tenório (marcelllo-martin) wrote :

Same problem here... :P

marcelo@BeetleII:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 1004.584
cache size : 256 KB
...

Using GeForce 6220 AGP.

Thanks.

Revision history for this message
David Planella (dpm) wrote :

In case this helps, here is another report. I can reproduce this bug with exactly the same symptoms described above. Here is the CPU info:

processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1832.896
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 3670.00
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote :

Seems only to affect older computors, my P3 doesn't work but my Dell Latitude D520 does.

Revision history for this message
JanMalte (janmalte) wrote :

Me too

Revision history for this message
CassieMoondust (cassie-lx) wrote :

I have the same problem, also.

Booting stops after the checking hlt....ok line
Older kernels works.

My system: AthlonXP 3200+, Abit AN7 with nForce2 chipset and 1GB RAM, nVidia Geforce 7600GT AGP 512MB

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote :

... not to make it "only" "me-too"... heres the screenshot of the "hlt" output in debug (root shell) mode...

all amd64 (one turion NB, 2x Athlons 64x2) on 64bit-ubuntus boot fine after the update.

I tried booting the old FujitsuSiemensComputers FSC E-Series E-6500 with 256 (!sic, 2x128MB, so no update feasible, bigger modules seem so rare and it is not worth the money...) MB Ram and this prozessor:

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 648.276
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse up
bogomips : 1297.91
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
tino (tino-kissig) wrote :

I have this problem as well.

* ASUS S1300A series Notebook PC
* Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz
* 640 MB RAM
* Chipset Graphics Controller: Intel 82830 CGC

Revision history for this message
Ed Hewitt (edhewitt-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

I have the same issue, Xubuntu 8.04.1

Intel Celeron 633Mhz
256mb RAM
ATi Radeon 7000 (64mb) using 'radeon' driver

Revision history for this message
max69 (maxime-bely) wrote :

Same here on xubuntu 8.04 kernel 2.6.24-20.
Intel Pentium 3 Coppermine.
If you need any logs just ask.

Revision history for this message
Patrick Schueller (pschuel) wrote :

Not only generic...
Same here with Kubuntu 8.04 using the -rt variant (2.6.24-20-rt).

Not tested with -generic because that causes other problems on my machine (freeze on USB access).

Acer Travelmate 220
Mobile Intel Celeron 1333
1 GB RAM

Revision history for this message
reech (r-mcmillan) wrote : confirmed here

Athlon XP 2800+
Radeon driver.

Interesting error when removing the package:

Replacing config file /var/run/grub/menu.lst with new version
Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done

The link /vmlinuz is a damaged link
Removing symbolic link vmlinuz you may need to re-run your boot loader[grub]
The link /initrd.img is a damaged link
Removing symbolic link initrd.img you may need to re-run your boot loader[grub]

Vanilla install.

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

In order to track down the problem I put some kernels to http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ where I removed some of the changes that went into the 20.37 release. If someone could give that a try and report back to this bug.

Revision history for this message
Scott Armitage (scott-armitage) wrote :

Same problem, using generic.

CPU: AMD AthlonXP 2500+
Chipset: nVidia nForce2 Ultra400
Graphics: Radeon 9600xt

---
sarmitage@ophelia:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm)
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 2004.679
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 4012.34
clflush size : 32
---

Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

I also have the same problem

processor info

petar@aurora:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 1837.616
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 3678.10
clflush size : 32

GeForce FX 5200, Asus motherboard with NV2 chipset

Revision history for this message
mistseeker@gmail.com (mistseeker) wrote :

Same problem here, .20 stops at the hlt check.

Acer Aspire 1350 series, AMD Athlon 2.6 , via KM400 graphics.

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote :

Hi Stefan Bader, have tried the 20.37 i386.deb, but the problem remains exactly the same.

Revision history for this message
Mr Freeze (rockula-mike) wrote :

Stefan Bader,

I downloaded and installed the i386.debs you posted at http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ and still get the same result when rebooting.

Hardy 8.04.1 desktop-i386
MachSpeed Viper V4DP M/B, w/Via KM400 chipset
Sempron 2500+ processor
Sapphire Radeon 9600XT running ATI Catalyst 8.7 driver

Revision history for this message
Taylor "Ripps" LeMasurier-Wren (ripps818) wrote :

Stefan Balder:
The fix does nothing. Sorry.

Revision history for this message
Mack (ldm1979) wrote :

Ditto

Thanks to ivex82 for the workaround

Revision history for this message
Casey J Peter (caseyjp1) wrote :

Same issue with 2.6.24-20-generic

System:
x2 3800 dual core AMD
nvidia 8800GTS
2gig 128bit dual channel ram
mixed sata/pata drives

On my system it doesn't halt, but it doesn't know that there is an nvidia card plus the latest nvidia drivers on board. It gets to the "problem with x" and continue/configure in low rez gui mode. Selecting continue then locks the system.

Revision history for this message
FAJALOU (fajalou) wrote :

Same issue:

But I'm not on AMD... I'm on AOpen

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 11
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1000MHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1197.689
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse up
bogomips : 2397.67
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
Kub (alpignolo-mail) wrote :

Me too... Freeze at the "hlt".

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
Frequency 1400.727 MHz
L2 cache 256 KB
1GB ram
Via chipset
GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X

Revision history for this message
reech (r-mcmillan) wrote :

@stefan :

The posted kernel results in the same problem.

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Arkadiusz Piekarz (piekarzarkadiusz) wrote :

Kernel 2.6.24-20-386 works for me, but I had to recompile madwifi drivers.

I got Asus F5VL, Core 2 Duo T5250, Ubuntu 8.04.1.

Revision history for this message
Riccardo 'c10ud' (c10ud) wrote :

i confirm the bug

processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 1916.113
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 3836.83
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
palimmo (palimmo) wrote :

Same problem with Athlon XP 2400+ e nvidia....
But I'm a stupid and I've removed other kernels before rebooting.

Are there any solution? :( HELP

Revision history for this message
®om (rom1v) wrote :

Same problem with AMD Sempron 3000+.

No problem on my laptop (Core 2 Duo T7500)

Revision history for this message
midnightflash (midnightflash) wrote :

Affected:
AMD 3200+
nForce2
nVidia 6800

NOT Affected:
Pentium-M 1600
Intel ICH4
Radeon M7 (7500)

Revision history for this message
Heindl (martin-heindl) wrote :

I have the same problem with AMD Sempron 2200+.

Revision history for this message
Dmytro Tkanov (akademi4eg) wrote :

Athlon 2k+
:(

Revision history for this message
hans13 (hans13) wrote :

The same problem:
Ubuntu 8.04
AMD Duron 1.8
nForce 2
Radeon 9600

Revision history for this message
Mossroy (mossroy) wrote :

Same problem for me
Ubuntu 8.04.1
nvidia video card

processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 2191.308
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 4386.03
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
Taylor "Ripps" LeMasurier-Wren (ripps818) wrote :

It seems only older CPU's are affected. Maybe one of the updates forced the kernel to use new cpu instructions (like SSE2), when it shouldn't. Just a guess.

Revision history for this message
Haspet (haspet) wrote :

Yes, this same problem on my Ubuntu 8.04, AMD 1700+, nforce2, GeForce 2 MX/MX 400...

Revision history for this message
Zippex Linux Developer (zippex) wrote :

Same happens to me! AMD Athelon xp, nvidia geforce FX 5200...i386

Revision history for this message
Bernard Banko (beernarrd) wrote :

Nvidia cards I guess. Any non nforce2 cards affected?

Revision history for this message
Jonny T. (jonny-treutlein) wrote :

Same problem...
AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Nvidia Geforce 5200 FX

Revision history for this message
Tobias B (tobiasbirmili) wrote :

Nearly the same system.
AMD Athlon XP and Nvidia GeForce 5200FX

Revision history for this message
Miguel (mijel84) wrote :

Same problem with amd athlon 2600xp, ati radeon 9600xt 128.

I haven't problem with toshiba intel centrino duo 1.66ghz and intel945. It is good.

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

@Bernard Banko: What do you mean by "non nforce2 cards"? nforce2 is a chipset on motherboards supporting AMD's Socket A - we've got also some P3 with hangs. Or did you think of graphic cards? They are called GeForce.

Well my board has no nforce but a via chipset:

Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600 AGP] Host Bridge (rev 80)
ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge

but the Graphic is a GeForce7600 GS

Revision history for this message
Taylor "Ripps" LeMasurier-Wren (ripps818) wrote :

@Benard Banko:
It's not the video card, because I have an ATI 9600 Pro. Also, it probably isn't the chipset, because they are from a bunch of different venders. They only thing I can see consistently is that all the failing computers have a K7 processor or below.

Revision history for this message
Bernard Banko (beernarrd) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

I meant the chipset. I didn't know about P3.

Dne 25.07.2008 (pet) ob 15:33 +0000 je Steffen Banhardt zapisal(a):
> @Bernard Banko: What do you mean by "non nforce2 cards"? nforce2 is a
> chipset on motherboards supporting AMD's Socket A - we've got also some
> P3 with hangs. Or did you think of graphic cards? They are called
> GeForce.
>
> Well my board has no nforce but a via chipset:
>
> Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600 AGP] Host Bridge (rev 80)
> ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
>
> but the Graphic is a GeForce7600 GS
>

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

Made a list out of this bug, its duplicates and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5447185 of affected cpus:

AMD Athlon XP 1600+
AMD Athlon XP 1800+
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
AMD Athlon XP 2400+
AMD Athlon XP 2500+
AMD Athlon XP 2600+
AMD Athlon XP 2800+
AMD Athlon XP 3000+
AMD Athlon XP 3200+
AMD Duron 1800
AMD Sempron 2200+
AMD Sempron 2500+
AMD Sempron 2500+
AMD Sempron 2600+
AMD Sempron 2600+
AMD Sempron 2600+
AMD Sempron 3000+
AMD Sempron 3000+

AMD Mobile Athlon XP-M 2200+
AMD Athlon XP-M 2,6

Intel Celeron @600
Intel Celeron @633
Intel Celeron CPU @1000

Mobile Intel Celeron @1333

Intel Pentium 3
Intel Pentium 3 Katmai @450
Intel Pentium 3 648.276
Intel Pentium III @1000

Intel Pentium 3 Mobile @1200

----------------------------------------
Reported as *NOT* affected are

Intel Pentium 4 3.20ghz
Intel Pentium-M 1600
Intel Core Duo @1830
AMD Athlon 64 X2
AMD Turion 64 (mobile)
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/linux/+bug/251344/comments/36

x2 3800 dual core AMD with a nvidia 8800GTS

seems to be another problem similar to this one
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5454084#post5454084

Intel Pentium Dual Core E2180 with aNVIDIA GE Force 8500GT

Revision history for this message
Chris11 (c-ganzoni) wrote :

same problem here... booting stopped at "start up..."

AMD 2000+
MSI K2 Combo
1.3 MB RAM
ATI Radeon 9000 Pro 64MB

Revision history for this message
Sergei Andreev (seajey) wrote :

Same problem with Athlon XP 2500+ nvidia chipset/card

Did a stupid thing - removed all older kernels :(

Revision history for this message
Arkadiusz Piekarz (piekarzarkadiusz) wrote :

I'm sorry, I wrote that 2.6.24-20-386 works for me and I have Intel Core 2 Duo T5250, but kernel 2.6.24-20-generic DOESN"T WORK for me. That's why I had to download other version. Se please mark my CPU as affected.

Revision history for this message
Martin (martin-zdila) wrote :

The same for me @ Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1000MHz

Dell Latitude C610

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote :

fre 2008-07-25 klockan 18:44 +0000 skrev Sergei Andreev:
> Same problem with Athlon XP 2500+ nvidia chipset/card
>
> Did a stupid thing - removed all older kernels :(
>

If you boot with The LiveCD, and follow this:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=306424&highlight=chroot

But also manually download 2.6.24-19, before reboot. You may also
edit /boot/grub/menu.lst "Default = 2"

Revision history for this message
piagent (piagent) wrote :

The upgrade from 2.6.24-19 to 2.6.24-20 has presented a problem:
Sony laptop PCG-505ls: NG starting, assume bios, .......
Dell laptop Latitude C610 or older (?): NG starting, ......
Dell laptop Latitude D800: OK
Dell laptop Latitude D600 x3: OK
ALtima AMD 800 custom desktop: OK

btw, I used the launchpad Firefox plugin, works great. Anyone know of a launchpad bug feeder/reader?

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote :

Sergei Andreev!
Install this packages:
linux-headers-2.6.24-19 install
linux-headers-2.6.24-19-generic install
linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic install
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-19-generic install
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-19-generic install

/boot/grub/menu.lst:
title Ubuntu 8.04.1, kernel 2.6.24-19-generic
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-19-generic root=UUID=.... ro quiet splash
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-19-generic
quiet

title Ubuntu 8.04.1, kernel 2.6.24-19-generic (recovery mode)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-19-generic root=UUID=.... ro single
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-19-generic

Revision history for this message
kestrel1 (glyn-kcsdorset) wrote :

Same problem. AMD Athlon 2600+ & 1.5gb Ram.
Turned off proposed updates now & continuing to boot from kernel 2.6.24-19-generic.

Revision history for this message
Sergei Andreev (seajey) wrote :

2 bbauto:
Thanks for solution, the first one have worked for me.

Revision history for this message
X3 (x3lectric) wrote :

I add this as well as a also very dispoiting experience with my first ubuntu install I get this kind of thing...

Mistakes happen but I thught that was onlly reseverd to Microsoft.

Rant aside since this is a critical and known issue should be withrawn from servers and auto porposed nupdates ASAP until proper fix is availabel.

Same is true wit RT versions of kernel in fact no flavour of linux that will install the proposed 2.6.24-20 wll work...

I know we can always revert to the previous kernel but lets be realistic here.

Revision history for this message
Taylor "Ripps" LeMasurier-Wren (ripps818) wrote :

@X3:
I agree that this was a blunder, and probably shouldn't have happened. But keep in mind, this was in the Proposed Updates repository. These updates aren't meant to be considered official updates. Proposed Updates is a testing bed to catch these kind of problems before they hit mainstream.
If you want a perfectly stable Ubuntu, then don't use unstable untested software, and stick with the standard update repository

Revision history for this message
Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote :

I agree 100% with what Ripps818 says. This update only went in to hardy-proposed, which is a testing repository for updated packages. hardy-proposed is aimed at people wanting to test updated packages, and is designed to catch problems like this. The only users affected by this problem are those who have explicitly enabled the hardy-proposed testing repository, and not the general user base. People running hardy-proposed should be prepared for occasional breakage like this (as is the case with running the unstable branch)

Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

OK! I BELIEVE I LOCATED THE PROBLEM!!!

Everyone with this problem try this.
UNINSTALL NVidia or ATI drivers that I'm mutch sure you installed using EnvyNG. Then reinstall the latest 2.6.24-20 kernel and reboot.
Then you can add your restricted drivers again by using EnvyNG.

I'm 99% certain that EnvyNG is the culprit for our problems.

Revision history for this message
Taylor "Ripps" LeMasurier-Wren (ripps818) wrote :

@Peter Velkovski:
Nope, sorry. I'm not using any propreitary drivers. I'm using the opensource Radeon drivers.
Also, I find it highly unlikely that any video drivers are the culprit, since they are loaded as modules later in the booting process. Most of us can't even get past the initial CPU check.

Revision history for this message
Ronison (ronison) wrote :

Same .20 problem here.

CPU Info: Intel Pentium III Tualatin 1.4 Ghz
Video card: NVidia w/ proprietary dirver version.

Regards,

Revision history for this message
Rob Bean (beansmyname) wrote :

Same problem here: Stops right after "hlt" check.

CPU Info: AMD Athlon XP 2400+

Revision history for this message
Edu Gnipper (edugnipper) wrote :

"Same problem here: Stops right after "hlt" check."

Same here too....

CPU: Intel Pentium III 1.13 GHz
Motherboard: ECS P6S5AT
Video card: NVidia GeForce FX5200 128MB AGP with proprietary driver version installed with EnvyNG.

Revision history for this message
hkootstra (hkootstra) wrote :

I agree but how do we newbe's correct it ?

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:56 +0000, Ripps818 wrote:

> @X3:
> I agree that this was a blunder, and probably shouldn't have happened. But keep in mind, this was in the Proposed Updates repository. These updates aren't meant to be considered official updates. Proposed Updates is a testing bed to catch these kind of problems before they hit mainstream.
> If you want a perfectly stable Ubuntu, then don't use unstable untested software, and stick with the standard update repository
>

Revision history for this message
hkootstra (hkootstra) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

That's another blunder , that anybody gets to download this stuff,
without knowing. I mean going to get the stuff from update manager
should be safe isn't it?

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 02:48 +0000, hkootstra wrote:

> I agree but how do we newbe's correct it ?
>
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:56 +0000, Ripps818 wrote:
>
> > @X3:
> > I agree that this was a blunder, and probably shouldn't have happened. But keep in mind, this was in the Proposed Updates repository. These updates aren't meant to be considered official updates. Proposed Updates is a testing bed to catch these kind of problems before they hit mainstream.
> > If you want a perfectly stable Ubuntu, then don't use unstable untested software, and stick with the standard update repository
> >
>

Revision history for this message
MMarking (cpt-mocha) wrote :

Same issue here. Not using the Envy Nvidia driver.

Revision history for this message
reech (r-mcmillan) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

press escape during boot and choose the 2.6.24-19 kernel.

You could also remove the 2.6.24-20 kernel package via synaptic for the
moment

2008/7/26 hkootstra <email address hidden>

> I agree but how do we newbe's correct it ?
>
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:56 +0000, Ripps818 wrote:
>
> > @X3:
> > I agree that this was a blunder, and probably shouldn't have happened.
> But keep in mind, this was in the Proposed Updates repository. These updates
> aren't meant to be considered official updates. Proposed Updates is a
> testing bed to catch these kind of problems before they hit mainstream.
> > If you want a perfectly stable Ubuntu, then don't use unstable untested
> software, and stick with the standard update repository
> >
>
> --
> Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251344
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--

Richard B McMillan
M :: +44(0)7783 106 604

If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still
has one object.
If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has
two ideas.
- George Bernard Shaw

Revision history for this message
AndrewSavchuk (andrewsavchuk) wrote :

Same problem - AMD Athlon XP 2600+

Revision history for this message
Michele B. (lupp0l0) wrote :

Same problem here:

processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm)
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 1994.511
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
bogomips : 3992.46
clflush size : 32

The PC freeze after the "Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK."
The next operation that would occur in a working kernel would be "SMP alternatives: switching to UP code"

Revision history for this message
AndrewSavchuk (andrewsavchuk) wrote :

variant of decision: Parameter `no-hlt' on boot

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

Someone else has very likely identified the problem and I put up some kernels that contain that fix. Please have a look at the latest kernels at http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ and let us know the results.

Revision history for this message
max69 (maxime-bely) wrote :

Sorry Stefan but the smb4 kernel does not solve the problem for me.
Xubuntu 8.04
pentium 3 coppermine

Revision history for this message
AliBaba (tttopuz) wrote :

Same here.
AMD Athlon 2800+

Revision history for this message
Nicolas M (nicolas-martin-gmail) wrote :

Same here with AMD Athlon 1700+

Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

The smb kernel from http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ also works for me but my processor is single core AMD Athlon XP. Also in my previous post when I suspected that EnvyNG is the problem I didn't make the system work with generic but with the 386 kernel.

To avoid any confusion please give us information what kernels should we test? Generic, smb, 386? Is only generic affected with this bug, or all of them? Also tell us if there are any log (debug??) files we should send to this post and how to obtain them.

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

lör 2008-07-26 klockan 12:18 +0000 skrev Stefan Bader:
> Someone else has very likely identified the problem and I put up some
> kernels that contain that fix. Please have a look at the latest kernels
> at http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ and let us know the results.
>
The smb..i386 doesn't work on my P III Coppermine

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote :

... neither works it on my pentium III coppermine...

Still some info how and where to look would be nice!

Revision history for this message
Mr Freeze (rockula-mike) wrote :

Stefan Bader,

The latest kernel fix you posted at http://people.ubuntu.com/~smb/bug251344/ worked for me, it booted just like it should. I'm running the AMD Sempron 2500+ cpu on the desktop-pc i386 version of Hardy.

Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Heindl (martin-heindl) wrote :

The latest kernel fix (Stefan Bader) is now OK.
I have dosktop-pc i386, Kubuntu 8.04, AMD Sempron 2200+.

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

The kernel fix works for me only partly: (Sempron 2600+)

It boots well, but X desn't start up with the old xorg.conf - I didn't get nvidia-glx installed, it seems that the card (GeForce 7600GS) isn't even recognized.

Revision history for this message
Robert Nelson (robertcnelson) wrote :

Stefan Bader,

linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.37smb4_i386.deb still fails to boot on a IBM T23 with P3 - Mobile

Halts at:
[ 4.530831] Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.

cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 11
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 798.000
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse up
bogomips : 1600.25
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
Patrick Curran (pjcurran) wrote :

Stefan Bader,

I could not get the latest fix to work. I assume I just needed to install the package and boot the kernel. I have a pentium III. What hardware information should we include to be most helpful? Thanks.

--Patrick

Revision history for this message
Ken Gutkowski (mordak) wrote :

Same issue here Athlon XP 3200 Nvidia card, etc... etc... .19 Kernel works now I'll keep my fingers crossed.

Revision history for this message
Mr Freeze (rockula-mike) wrote :

Steffen Banhardt said:

The kernel fix works for me only partly: (Sempron 2600+)

It boots well, but X desn't start up with the old xorg.conf - I didn't get nvidia-glx installed, it seems that the card (GeForce 7600GS) isn't even recognized.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just wanted to add that I am using a Radeon 9600xt (256mb) graphics card with the latest ATI Catalyst 8.7 installed via "Method 2" on this page http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Hardy_Installation_Guide
Also, I installed the ATI Catalyst 8.7 while using the 2.6.24-19-generic kernel. Everything loaded perfectly, and I rebooted twice just to make sure; been using 2.6.24-20-generic for a little over 2 hours, no problems.

So, it appears that Stefan Bader's fix "linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.37smb4_i386.deb" is working for AMD processors (Athlon, Sempron, etc.) as far as getting the kernel to boot.

Revision history for this message
Raeff (raeff) wrote :

I have two machines to test.

1.) Old FujitsuSiemens Lifebook E Series
- Intel Pentium III-M 1 GHz
- 512 MB RAM
- Intel 830 Mobile Chipset
- ATI Radeon Mobility M6

This machine works with -19-generic, but not with -20-generic (neither the original 20.37 from hardy-proposed, nor the 20.37smb4 as posted above). The machine hangs like the others at "Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK."

2.) New FujitsuSiemens Lifebook S Series
- Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz (T7250)
- 2 GB RAM
- Intel Mobile 965 Express Chipset
- Intel GMX X3100 (chipset integrated)

That machine works with -19-generic and with -20-generic (from hardy-proposed).

If there is anything I could test on these machines please let me know.

Kind regards, Bernhard.

Revision history for this message
reech (r-mcmillan) wrote :

@ Stefan Bader,

The new kernel booted but broke sound, network and a few other things I'm sure.
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+
ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]

log attached

Revision history for this message
Reiner Hildebrandt (r-hilde-wit) wrote :

The Kernel "...20.37smb4_i386 " works for me, on AMD Sempron (tm)2600+
All works fine.

Thanks

Revision history for this message
nut (krystian-imielski) wrote :

- Stefan Bader
The same problem.
New kernel "linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic_2.6.24-20.37smb4_i386.deb" booted, but sound and graphic card was broken.

Sempron 2200+ Socket A
Abit NF7-s2 with audio controller (nvidia nforce2)
Radeon 9600

Revision history for this message
btr2 (randy50) wrote :

Count me in.

Won't boot past starting up or 'hlt' check in recovery mode.

Celeron 1 Ghz

512 MB memory

2.6.24-19-generic works great and I have reverted back to it.

Revision history for this message
Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) wrote :

Looks like I missed an upstream commit that affects a certain class of CPUs, e.g., those missing the RDTSC instruction. Please try the set of kernel packages at http://ppa.launchpad.net/timg-tpi/ubuntu. Alternatively, you can wait a couple of days and it will sort itself out after I upload another kernel.

Changed in linux:
assignee: nobody → timg-tpi
Revision history for this message
Xanax (4004uw) wrote :

Hmm.. my problem with this kernel is:

"Error 18 Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported by bios"

2-6-24-19 or earlyer no problem.

Asrock K7VT4A, 1800+, 40GB Maxtor (LBA mode!), 1 GB, Matrox Marvel G450eTV

And AMI BIOS (2005-05-19)

(Sorry, my bad English)

Revision history for this message
Eric Padman (mentalnotes) wrote :

I am also affected by this bug. 2.6.24-20-generic halted just after the hlt check. I have an Athlon XP 1500+ on a Gigabyte GA-7N400 motherboard with 1GB RAM.

Tim, I've upgraded to your kernel packages (2.6.24-21-generic etc.) and everything works well, kernel boots and all modules are working as far as I can see. No obvious errors shown in dmesg.

Revision history for this message
Wobbo (wobbo) wrote :

Same problem, on two systems running AMD Athlon MP 2400+.
One is a ubuntu 8.04 the other is mythubuntu. Previous kernel runs fine.

Revision history for this message
Igor Tarasov (tarasov-igor) wrote :

The same here, Cel 3 1200, 512Mb.

Revision history for this message
Robbt (robbt) wrote :

It happened to me to with a Intel Mobile 1.2 Ghz p3 on a Fujitsu Lifebook.

Revision history for this message
Ken Gutkowski (mordak) wrote :

Tim I tried the 2.6.24-21 kernels you listed at http://ppa.launchpad.net/timg-tpi/ubuntu/ and they boot up unlike the 2.6.24-20 kernel but after that upgrade my wireless card was MIA. I am using the rt61pci wireless driver. I restarted with the 2.6.24-19 kernel to get it back. I'm sure I'm missing something simple.

Revision history for this message
mor-bus (mor-bus) wrote :

Same problem here 2.6.24-20-generic does not work for me. 2.6.24-19-generic work as well.

System:
Kubuntu 8.04 (KDE3)
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
512 MB RAM
disc on Ext3
Video card: Nvida GeForce FX

(Bug #252110 is a Duplicates of this bug.)

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

2.6.24-21-generic works for me

AMD Sempron 2600+
Board: K7VT4A+
Geforce 7600 GS

Thanks Tim

Revision history for this message
Robert Nelson (robertcnelson) wrote :

Success! Thanks, Tim Gardner...

http://ppa.launchpad.net hardy/main:
linux-image-2.6.24-21-generic_2.6.24-21.41ubuntu1_i386.deb

Now correctly boots..

IBM T23
Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz

uname -a
Linux ubuntu-t23 2.6.24-21-generic #1 SMP Sat Jul 26 15:39:24 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote : Kernel 2.6.24.21 tested on P3 Coppermine - OK - but...

Tim Gardner's link was a little bit confusing, but I found a package called
linux-image-2.6.24-21-generic_2.6.24-21.41ubuntu1_i386.deb
and uname -r states 2.6.24-21-generic, too, so that one boots fine on the old P3 Coppermine...

Maybe offtopic #1:
but in dmesg appears rsrc_nonstatic: Unknown symbols
and yenta_socket: Unknown symbols (probably only the audio driver)

Maybe offtopic #2:
and - also I am not sure if it is related - amd64 with mdadm-raids on Kernel 2.6.24-20 have a (recoverable?) segfault.

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

@Grizzly:
You can add Tim's link directly to your sources.list - then you'll get also the new modules etc like:

linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-21-generic
linux-libc-dev
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-21-generic
linux-headers-2.6.24-21-generic
linux-headers-2.6.24-21

Revision history for this message
Àlex Magaz (rivaldi8) wrote :

It worked for me.

AMD Athlon XP 2200+
linux-image-2.6.24-21-generic_2.6.24-21.41ubuntu1_i386.deb

Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Ken Gutkowski (mordak) wrote :

I got 2.6.24-21-rt working with my rt61pci wireless card. [thumbsup]

Thanks Tim G.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Wilkins (wjeremy) wrote :

I installed 2.6.24-21-rt which works for me now after 2.6.24-20-rt failed to boot on AMD XP2200+ with NVIDIA legacy proprietary drivers. Thanks for the patch.

Revision history for this message
Rob van der Linde (robvdl) wrote :

Happened to me too, wouldn't boot, except for a blank blank screen.

But why use a PPA to resolve the issue? Why not just boot into the old '19' kernel, remove the '20' kernel, and untick backports under software sources.

Revision history for this message
Steffen Banhardt (steffenbanhardt) wrote :

You can boot to the old 19 of curse and remove proposed from your sources - proposed is for people willing to test new features. And thats the same with Tim's PPA. If you're willing to test it, do so, otherwise it could be wiser to remove proposed, of course.

Revision history for this message
bbauto (berglund-bengt) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

mån 2008-07-28 klockan 08:42 +0000 skrev Steffen Banhardt:
> You can boot to the old 19 of curse and remove proposed from your
> sources - proposed is for people willing to test new features. And thats
> the same with Tim's PPA. If you're willing to test it, do so, otherwise
> it could be wiser to remove proposed, of course.
>

Or simply edit "Default = 0 --> 2" in menu.lst, if you don't delete the
old kernel.
>From terminal: "sudo gedit /boot/grub/menu.lst" look for Default...

Revision history for this message
Sergio Callegari (callegar) wrote :

For more than 3 months now some people have been complaining about ununtu's 2.6.24 kernels causing random freezes to a few systems (see the many threads that come out googling for hardy + freeze). This particularly nasty bug is still unfixed.

It was noticed that 2.6.25 kernels did not have the issue. Conseqently the porting of a 2.6.25 kernel to hardy was asked many times (for instance see ubuntu brainstorm).

However, porting a 2.6.25 kernel to hardy was always excluded as a "big jump in the dark" in spite of most major distros and a huge number of users using it routinely. It was said that the right way to go was to backport pieces of 2.6.25 as patches to 2.6.24.

And now we have this incident proving that also the cherry-picking is no less a jump in the dark. At this point please rethink the kernel policies and let ubuntu follow the normal kernel updates provided by kernel.org. Or please, do it at least whenever moving to a well tested plain 2.6.x.y is easier than trying to patch-again an already very-much-patched and only-tested-by-ubuntu-users 2.6.x-k.

Revision history for this message
guna (sendtoguna) wrote :

same problem. Will the kernel that Tim refers to coming out in a couple of days get auto updated while I am running on 2.6.24.19 or is there something else I need to do to jump from .19 to .21 ?

BTW I had installed eclipse and it is not to be found anymore (says its not installed after I boot with 2.6.24.19) - is this normal for programs to be tied to the kernel and distribution (I thought they should not be). Will a fresh get of the program conflict with any future kernel update ?

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote : @Stephan Banhard: add to sources.list @Sergio Callegari

Stephan) Thanks, I did not realize it was that easy - for a testbed old notebook, I think I will simply add to sources.lst - lets see what's with the Audio

Sergio) fullACK even debian itself is on 2.6.25-something these days in my virtual machine... (I am thinking about making debian productive in autumn with next additional net- or subnotebook... to not only rely on ubuntu... I found openSolaris, fedora, openSuse or sabayon all not that usable than ubuntu...)... better to put the most current kernel.org kernel into "proposed" and then test that than a patch of a patch of a patch of something old... (e.g. rebuilding nvidia drivers etc. is sometimes required anyway with updates...) BUT: it felt like the versions 17 to 18 where more "performant" but on a marginal <= 50ms (?) latency on normal load) base...

Still one thing: nobody tells me, except "Try this patch" - what it MEANS how to look into the matter etc. remains obscure here. Is that only reserved for the brightest experts? Why must such a message than a "hlt" one be so "unexplained"? Does anyone know where to get a better EXPLANATION of what happened?

And a yes, the 2.6.24-20 from Tim Gardner does break my sound support. A shame, was the old notebook my preferred way of watching simpsons while surfing before the evening --- I'm back to .19 and wait for 2.6.25 something... which is sad, I wanted to give the old notebook away as a gift.. as much up to date as possible... still better than no pc at all for some, right?

Revision history for this message
Mark Grandi (markgrandi) wrote :

someone said that the newest kernel missed a commit or something that fixed a problem with the kernel calling RDST (acronym is most likely wrong) or some other cpu instruction, and all the people having the problems were cpus that dont have that instruction so the cpu locks up

the explanation is somewhere in this huge bug report, i just cant look through it right now

Revision history for this message
Grizzly (sven-witterstein) wrote : @Stephan Banhard, Tim Gardner

Yes I read that with the missing instruction on wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/rdtsc)

"This instruction was not formally part of the X86 assembly language at Pentium and was recommended for use by expert users or System Programmers only (Intel reference required). Pentium competitors such as the Cyrix 6x86 did not always have a TSC and may consider this instruction illegal. Use of this instruction in Linux distributions precludes Linux from booting where the CPU does not support RDTSC"

How it relates to "hlt" I cannot figure out (yet)

Now I have the .21 kernel and in total 10 packages updatet (headers etc.), a last try installed via deb line on Tim Gardners (? kernel image?) repo and audio is back, uname -r shows but now I have a bunch of boot-up warnings (shall I post dmesg or sth. else?) and usb-mouse on the single usb-port is sluggish...
Again, falling back to .19 for the time being.
Oh no, the boot messages about ata problems and whatever appear now in BOTH kernels (-21 and -19...)... looks like a reinstall candidate...

Suggestion: can we not introduce categories to a bug, wiki-style, so that "me too" and hardfacts can be separated/modified? I'll put that to "help improve lp" after thinking (or somebody do it) (over for now)

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bar (j.b) wrote :

More information on what see to be the same issue.

The kernel panics during the shorewall initialization during boot.

The laptop is a Thinkpad X60S.

Relevant packages installed:
$ dpkg -l |grep 2.6.24-20
ii linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic 2.6.24-20.20 Ubuntu supplied Linux modules
for version 2.
ii linux-headers-2.6.24-20 2.6.24-20.37 Header files related to Linux kernel version
ii linux-headers-2.6.24-20-generic 2.6.24-20.37 Linux kernel headers for version 2.6.24 on x
ii linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic 2.6.24-20.37 Linux kernel image for version 2.6.24 on x86
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.24-20.37 Linux Kernel Headers for development
ii linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-20-generic 2.6.24.14-20.46 Non-free Linux 2.6.24 modules on x86/x86_64
ii linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-20-generic 2.6.24-20.29 Ubuntu supplied Linux modules for version 2.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bar (j.b) wrote :

Attached lspci -vv output.

I don't have a dmesg from 2.6.24-20 because it seems like the syslog isn't enabled before the panic or disk didn't sync.

I could get more information if I find a null modem cable and enable serial console.

I will keep you posted.

Jeremy

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bar (j.b) wrote :

Sorry guys, my 2 postings relate to bug 251252. The administrator can remove them ...

I got confused, I have 2 laptops, one behaving like this bug, the other like bug 251252.

Jeremy

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

The problem should now be fixed with the latest kernel in -proposed (2.6.24-20.38). Could someone confirm this?

Revision history for this message
Fabio Serpa (fs3rp4) wrote :

I confirm this. Athlon 2600+ working fine now.

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Bengtsson (5ebastian) wrote :

After installing the new proposed kernel (2.6.24-20.38) the system boots successfully. (Yay!)

However now my graphics card is not recognized. After a lot of flickering X finally starts but with only 800x600 resolution.
When booting 2.6.24-19 the graphics works fine.

I guess that the graphicsproblems should go into a new bug(?) but this means I am still not using 2.6.24-20 kernel.
/Sebastian

Revision history for this message
Craig Maloney (craig-decafbad) wrote :

Confirmed working on my Athlon 2500+

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Bengtsson (5ebastian) wrote :

Actually lspci under 2.6.24-20.38 and 2.6.24-19 are identical, will try again if X works better after disabling proprietary nvidia drivers.

My report for a successfully booting 2.6.24-20.38 is on an Athlon 1600+ (Palomino) CPU.
/Sebastian

Revision history for this message
Mossroy (mossroy) wrote :

Same behavior as Sebastian Bengtsson.
The 2.6.24-20.38 kernel now boots fine : the current problem seems to be resolved in my case (Athlon XP 3200+).

But I have exactly the same issue with the graphic card : flickering then low resolution.
Mine is a nvidia Geforce 6200 SE, with the proprietary drivers ("nvidia" driver in xorg.conf) installed by the ubuntu wizard.

I also came back to 2.6.24-19...

Revision history for this message
Mr Freeze (rockula-mike) wrote :

Confirmed, working on AMD Sempron 2500+ with no problems.

Revision history for this message
Luigi Maselli (grigio) wrote :

the kernel 2.6.24-21-rt solves this problem, but I can't get the consoles tty with it. I just a blinking cursor

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : AMD Athlon(TM) XP1700+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 1109.909
cache size : 256 KB

Revision history for this message
Robert Nelson (robertcnelson) wrote :

Stefan Bader, Confirmed:

2.6.24-20.38 works on IBM T23
Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz

uname -a
Linux ubuntu-t23 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:49:24 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

Revision history for this message
Ronison (ronison) wrote :

Is all working fine now! Thanks.

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 11
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) III CPU Tualatin family 1400MHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1406.414
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse up
bogomips : 2815.75
clflush size : 32

$uname -a
Linux dartagnan 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:49:52 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

linux-image-2.6.24-20-generic boots on my computer, but the Sound Card is not detected!

AMD AthlonXP2500+, Asus board with NVIDIA nForce2 chipset

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Bengtsson (5ebastian) wrote :

After disabling proprietary nvidia driver xorg at normal resolution without problems.

However there are some kind of issue remaining as the proprietary hardware drivers guide (jockey-gtk) now doesn't recognize there is an nvidia card present for which a proprietary driver (nvidia-legacy in this case) could be installed.

uname:
Linux molly 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:49:52 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
lspci:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV15DDR [GeForce2 Ti] (rev a4)

I am sorry if this is going off topic. But it appears that the new kernel introduces some minor regressions.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bar (j.b) wrote :

2.6.24-20.38 fixes the issue for me as well.

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 647.199
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips : 1295.48
clflush size : 32

Revision history for this message
X3 (x3lectric) wrote :

I believe these failures are AMD CPU bound sine I hav e tested 15 machines and 4 of which are MAD and those failed.

On another note intrepid loads ok

Revision history for this message
Xanax (4004uw) wrote :

2.6.24-20.38 fixes the Error 18 when boot, but I get "Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure" and stop booting.

2.6.24-19 works fine.

Revision history for this message
Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote :

Xanax - You have a separate issue and should open a new bug report

Revision history for this message
max69 (maxime-bely) wrote :

Ok the computer is now booting with the proposed kernel but as mentionned earlier the nvidia drivers not recognized or something.
Intel Pentium 3 Coppermine
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev a1)

Revision history for this message
Jeramy Rutley (jrutley) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:19 AM, max69 <email address hidden> wrote:
> Ok the computer is now booting with the proposed kernel but as mentionned earlier the nvidia drivers not recognized or something.
> Intel Pentium 3 Coppermine
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev a1)

My nvidia driver is also not recognised (AMD Athlon XP 1800+ with a
GeForce 5200FX video card, if that matters) on the latest
2.6.24-20-generic.

Revision history for this message
MMarking (cpt-mocha) wrote :

System boots now with updated kernel but no nvidia driver.

03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 420] (rev a3)

Nvidia GeForce MX420

Revision history for this message
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf-hildebrandt) wrote : Re: [Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot

* MMarking <email address hidden>:
> System boots now with updated kernel but no nvidia driver.

Did you forget to install the appropriate
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-20-generic
package?

--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) <email address hidden>
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Shaun Crampton (fasaxc) wrote :

I'm seeing the same, system boots but goes into graphics safe mode.

$ apt-cache policy linux-restricted-modules
linux-restricted-modules:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.6.24.20.22
  Version table:
     2.6.24.20.22 0
        500 http://ubuntu.virginmedia.com hardy-proposed/restricted Packages
     2.6.24.19.21 0
        500 http://ubuntu.virginmedia.com hardy-updates/restricted Packages
        500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/restricted Packages
     2.6.24.16.18 0
        500 http://ubuntu.virginmedia.com hardy/restricted Packages

Revision history for this message
Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) wrote :

linux (2.6.24-20.38) hardy-proposed; urgency=low

  [Tim Gardner]

  * SAUCE: Export usbhid_modify_dquirk for LBM module bcm5974
    - LP: #250838
  * Enable TULIP ethernet support in virtual appliance flavour
    - LP: #250857
  * VIA AGP VT3364 is not detected
    - LP: #251854
  * VIA - Add VIA DRM Chrome9 3D engine
    - LP: #251862

  [Upstream Kernel Changes]

  * net/usb: add support for Apple USB Ethernet Adapter
    - LP: #232200
  * acpi: fix "buggy BIOS check" when CPUs are hot removed
    - LP: #248509
  * x86: fix paranoia about using BIOS quickboot mechanism.
    - LP: #248905
  * flush kacpi_notify_wq before removing notify handler
    - LP: #248509
  * fix a deadlock issue when poking "eject" file
    - LP: #248509
  * force offline the processor during hot-removal
    - LP: #248509
  * create sysfs link from acpi device to sysdev for cpu
    - LP: #248509
  * x86: fix bootup crash in native_read_tsc() (aka use XMM2)
    - LP: #249135
  * x86: lfence fix - LFENCE is available on XMM2 or higher
    Intel CPUs - not XMM or higher...
    - LP: #249135

 -- Tim Gardner <email address hidden> Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:12:46 -0600

Changed in linux:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
MMarking (cpt-mocha) wrote :

>Did you forget to install the appropriate
>linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-20-generic
>package?

No, I have them installed.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Can you confirm that the -20.38 version fixes the regression? Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Craig Maloney (craig-decafbad) wrote :

It appears to be booting properly now.

Revision history for this message
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf-hildebrandt) wrote :

* Martin Pitt <email address hidden>:
> Can you confirm that the -20.38 version fixes the regression? Thank you!

Yes, the -20.38 version fixes the regression!

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Did only affect hardy-proposed. Thank you for testing!

Changed in linux:
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

This kernel (-20.38) now works for me. I'm using it as my default kernel from yesterday.

Revision history for this message
Mossroy (mossroy) wrote :

The booting regression is solved for me, but 2.6.24-20.38 kernel gave another regression for some of us : the display falls back in low-resolution (graphics safe mode). Maybe it's https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/254418
Looks like it's related to nvidia cards only.

Revision history for this message
David Planella (dpm) wrote :

I experiency exactly the same issues as the previous poster.

Revision history for this message
Petar Velkovski (pvelkovski) wrote :

Ok, just to be clear. I had to reinstall nvidia drivers with EnvyNG every time i changed kernel. From 2.6.24-16 -> 2.6.24-17, 2.6.24-17->2.6.24-18 etc. So I personally don't consider this as a bug, but as something that has to be done every time we switch to a newer kernel build. If this is a bug, I presume it is connected with EnvyNG, not with the kernel build.

Revision history for this message
David Planella (dpm) wrote :

Regarding to the previous post, I have never had to reinstall the nvidia driver, which is the one available from the -restricted-modules package. It has seamlessly worked throughout all kernel updates until -20. I have never used EnvyNG nor did I know what it was until I googled for it.

Revision history for this message
Krzysztof Janowicz (janowicz) wrote :

i have exactly the same problem, the system hangs when trying to start X (only showing the nvidia logo). switching to the nv driver does not solve the problem. i switched back to -19 for the moment.

Revision history for this message
Shaun Crampton (fasaxc) wrote :

I just tried -21. It seems to work fine. I have an NVIDIA gfx card and it booted into X at my normal resolution.

Revision history for this message
Sergei Andreev (seajey) wrote :

-21 works for me

Revision history for this message
Mossroy (mossroy) wrote :

-21 works for me too. Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Scott Armitage (scott-armitage) wrote :

-21 works for me as well.

-Scott

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.