Comment 49 for bug 1861359

Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote :

Andrea, this new kernel looks promising.

Linux millbarge 5.4.0-17-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 28 16:18:44 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Unfortunately I didn't check the reproducer before rebooting: the error message I get with it now suggests that it might not work any more.

However, this visualization https://platform.leolabs.space/visualizations/leo sure feels like it would have the heft to reproduce the problem. It worked fine for me in both firefox and chromium-browser:

sarnold 4987 14.1 3.0 3042112 495860 ? Sl 03:42 0:46 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox
sarnold 5070 7.3 1.8 2651760 293108 ? Sl 03:42 0:23 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox -contentproc -childID 1
sarnold 5175 2.5 0.9 2559560 155888 ? Sl 03:42 0:08 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox -contentproc -childID 2
sarnold 5736 5.6 2.9 4144456 476876 ? Sl 03:42 0:17 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox -contentproc -childID 4
sarnold 9668 0.3 0.4 2382156 71616 ? Sl 03:46 0:00 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox -contentproc -childID 6

sarnold 10394 6.7 1.1 3036576 182812 ? Sl 03:48 0:04 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10672 0.0 0.2 407644 47472 ? S 03:48 0:00 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10674 0.0 0.0 407644 12932 ? S 03:48 0:00 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10690 17.9 2.3 1269704 372880 ? Sl 03:48 0:10 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10694 0.8 0.4 1014184 77752 ? Sl 03:48 0:00 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10735 60.2 3.2 6219072 521464 ? Sl 03:48 0:36 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom
sarnold 10780 0.0 0.3 5498108 51232 ? Sl 03:48 0:00 /snap/chromium/1040/usr/lib/chrom

I also did several git fast-forward merges on various Linux git trees; these have not been reliable reproducers, but they also completed without trouble.

An uptime of 30 minutes is perhaps too short to declare success but this is certainly promising.

Thanks