Comment 14 for bug 1850867
Revision history for this message
| Jann Horn (corp account) (jannh) wrote | #14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Nitpick: Ah, I guess you're looking at a different version of shiftfs - the eoan version I'm looking at uses the same ->f_op->open handler for both. If you have to do two separate checks anyway, the standard way would be to just compare the ->f_op pointer instead of the ->f_op->open handler - but that doesn't really matter.