Shit, that was a typo. I meant to say that 2.4.26-1-generic fixed the
issue. My apologies.
Thanks,
Jim.
Steve Langasek said the following:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:10:33PM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
>
>>2.4.25-1-generic works fine here for me and I know older Debian
>>kernel-image packages would not. I don't remember the specific text
>>spewed by the older kernels off hand, but they were basically unusable.
>
>
> Can you confirm whether the kernel images at
> http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/fixed-alpha-kernels/ do or don't work
> for you? It's important to know whether this change represents a
> regression for anyone currently able to use the official kernel-image
> packages.
>
> Thanks,
Shit, that was a typo. I meant to say that 2.4.26-1-generic fixed the
issue. My apologies.
Thanks,
Jim.
Steve Langasek said the following: people. debian. org/~vorlon/ fixed-alpha- kernels/ do or don't work
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:10:33PM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
>
>>2.4.25-1-generic works fine here for me and I know older Debian
>>kernel-image packages would not. I don't remember the specific text
>>spewed by the older kernels off hand, but they were basically unusable.
>
>
> Can you confirm whether the kernel images at
> http://
> for you? It's important to know whether this change represents a
> regression for anyone currently able to use the official kernel-image
> packages.
>
> Thanks,