I would like to expand the release scope of this bug to include Quantal (and future releases), as a request for this has been filed for Quantal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1078624 , and comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/comments/45 . Also, it would not be a stretch to think when Raring and future releases are out, people will want report-builder to work.
As well, I would like to expand the implementation scope from just an SRU request to also needs-packaging. This is in full understanding how this is not an SRU candidate as per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/comments/11 . However, this may be a backport candidate as defined in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports#Requesting_a_Backport .
If this is objectionable, please retoggle as desired.
Thank you for your understanding.
I would like to expand the release scope of this bug to include Quantal (and future releases), as a request for this has been filed for Quantal https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libreoffice/ +bug/1078624 , and comment https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libreoffice/ +bug/992232/ comments/ 45 . Also, it would not be a stretch to think when Raring and future releases are out, people will want report-builder to work.
As well, I would like to expand the implementation scope from just an SRU request to also needs-packaging. This is in full understanding how this is not an SRU candidate as per https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libreoffice/ +bug/992232/ comments/ 11 . However, this may be a backport candidate as defined in https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/UbuntuBackp orts#Requesting _a_Backport .
If this is objectionable, please retoggle as desired.
Thank you for your understanding.