Comment 15 for bug 1264551

But how would lv_LV@euro differ from already wildly used lv_LV.UTF-8? If it is just an alias to lv_LV.UTF-8 than ok but otherwise I don't see point in creating lv_LV@euro as it should be equal to lv_LV.UTF-8.

(In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #11)
> My worry is that there are programs written that support the BALTIC
> character set but don't run correctly in full UTF-8. Offering the
> alternative lv_LV@euro (using UTF-8) allows a distribution to default to
> lv_LV@euro with users using lv_LV to run older programs that don't fully
> work with UTF-8?
>
> Does that make sense?