> Any security concerns on taking out stack-protector?
All older versions of iptables where compiled without this feature, so it doesn't get worse at least. (-fstack-protector is now enabled by default in Ubuntu's gcc-4.1, that's how it got in.)
> Any security concerns on taking out stack-protector?
All older versions of iptables where compiled without this feature, so it doesn't get worse at least.
(-fstack-protector is now enabled by default in Ubuntu's gcc-4.1, that's how it got in.)