10.10 running slow

Asked by Mary Pratt

I have 10.10 Netbook, and lately my internet (wifi connection) has been running slow. Is there anything I can do to clean up or defrag to make my system a little faster?

Thanks

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Ubuntu gnome-nettool Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Mary Pratt
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#1

Ext4 which is default in Ubuntu does NOT get fragmented. It has a journal. Ext2 can get fragnmented but your OS will not have used this if you have used default settings.

Can you give the output of:

uname -a; lsb_release -a; free -m

Can you also give the make and model of netbook, you haven't told us and its quite important.....

Revision history for this message
Mary Pratt (prattmt) said :
#2

output:

mmary@mary-HP-Mini-210-1000:~$ uname -a
Linux mary-HP-Mini-210-1000 2.6.35-25-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 21 17:40:48 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
mary@mary-HP-Mini-210-1000:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 10.10
Release: 10.10
Codename: maverick
mary@mary-HP-Mini-210-1000:~$ free -m
             total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 990 952 38 0 22 310
-/+ buffers/cache: 619 371
Swap: 2408 236 2172

I have an HP Mini 210. I've only had it since late November.

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#3

ok so you have 1Gb RAM but you are onlyusing 371Mb currently. So the web is running slow you say. Can you give the output of:

sudo lshw -C network

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Mary Pratt (prattmt) said :
#4

  *-network
       description: Ethernet interface
       product: RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller
       vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
       logical name: eth0
       version: 02
       serial: c8:0a:a9:79:fd:1d
       size: 10MB/s
       capacity: 100MB/s
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix vpd bus_master cap_list rom ethernet physical tp mii 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation
       configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169 driverversion=2.3LK-NAPI duplex=half latency=0 link=no multicast=yes port=MII speed=10MB/s
       resources: irq:42 ioport:5000(size=256) memory:50010000-50010fff memory:50000000-5000ffff memory:50020000-5002ffff
  *-network
       description: Wireless interface
       product: BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY
       vendor: Broadcom Corporation
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
       logical name: eth1
       version: 01
       serial: f0:7b:cb:29:e2:a5
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress bus_master cap_list ethernet physical wireless
       configuration: broadcast=yes driver=wl0 driverversion=5.60.48.36 ip=192.168.1.3 latency=0 multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11bg
       resources: irq:17 memory:56000000-56003fff

I talked to HP to see what I could do, but they pretty much told me I was out of luck because I'm running an OS they didn't install in it.

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#5

ok try:

gksudo gedit /etc/default/grub

Change:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
To:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash ipv6.disable=1"

Save the new file, close gedit and run:

sudo update-grub

Also try:

gksudo gedit /etc/sysctl.conf

add this text:

net.core.rmem_default = 524288
net.core.rmem_max = 524288
net.core.wmem_default = 524288
net.core.wmem_max = 524288
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 87380 524288
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 524288
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 524288 524288 524288
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337 = 1
net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc = 0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0
net.ipv4.route.flush = 1
vm.swappiness = 0

Save the new file and now reboot, is it any better?

Revision history for this message
Mary Pratt (prattmt) said :
#6

Seems to be working fine now. Thank you soooo much! You're totally my hero today!

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#7

Glad it worked :)