(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #33)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #32)
> > (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #31)
> > > gcc should catch up.
> >
> > I thought Google employed some capable C/C++ engineers...
>
> What I meant is that those engineers, if they exist, could help GCC "catch
> up" (whatever that means)... gcc does not develop itself or by magic gnomes,
> you know.
Hum, that still sounds worse than it sounded in my mind. Sorry, I'm dense this morning :)
Just: help us, we love you, let's make the world a better place together :)
(deleting comments in bugzilla would be helpful sometimes).
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #33)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #32)
> > (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #31)
> > > gcc should catch up.
> >
> > I thought Google employed some capable C/C++ engineers...
>
> What I meant is that those engineers, if they exist, could help GCC "catch
> up" (whatever that means)... gcc does not develop itself or by magic gnomes,
> you know.
Hum, that still sounds worse than it sounded in my mind. Sorry, I'm dense this morning :)
Just: help us, we love you, let's make the world a better place together :)
(deleting comments in bugzilla would be helpful sometimes).