(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #32)
> (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #31)
> > gcc should catch up.
>
> I thought Google employed some capable C/C++ engineers...
What I meant is that those engineers, if they exist, could help GCC "catch up" (whatever that means)... gcc does not develop itself or by magic gnomes, you know.
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #32)
> (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #31)
> > gcc should catch up.
>
> I thought Google employed some capable C/C++ engineers...
What I meant is that those engineers, if they exist, could help GCC "catch up" (whatever that means)... gcc does not develop itself or by magic gnomes, you know.