Message-Id: <1091782837.6778.20.camel@seb128>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:00:37 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: Ricardo Mones <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Bug#263263: Re: Bug#263263: file-roller: original tgz
lost, temporary tar damaged and unreadable
Le vendredi 06 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 10:38 +0200, Ricardo Mones a =E9crit :
> Well, I've got the original big tarball again and have tested
> several times in several ways and I'm unable to reproduce the weird
> behaviour I described originally :-(
Ok, I can't reproduce it neither ...
> already set it to important, but looks also like an automated email,
> do you know why?
I think he used the "bts" command line, it's a part of the devscrips
package. "bts severity 263263 important" and you get this result (you
need to have your local MTA working).
Message-Id: <1091782837. 6778.20. camel@seb128>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:00:37 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: Ricardo Mones <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Bug#263263: Re: Bug#263263: file-roller: original tgz
lost, temporary tar damaged and unreadable
Le vendredi 06 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 10:38 +0200, Ricardo Mones a =E9crit :
> Well, I've got the original big tarball again and have tested
> several times in several ways and I'm unable to reproduce the weird
> behaviour I described originally :-(
Ok, I can't reproduce it neither ...
> already set it to important, but looks also like an automated email,
> do you know why?
I think he used the "bts" command line, it's a part of the devscrips
package. "bts severity 263263 important" and you get this result (you
need to have your local MTA working).
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher