Comment 15 for bug 7291

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:28:12 +0200, Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 août 2004 à 10:21 +0200, Ricardo Mones a écrit :
>
> > That's the data loss I'm referring to. You may retitle the bug if you
> > prefer. I put that second part because it surprised me to found the
> > file uncompressed but damaged.
>
> No, it's fine, it was just to be sure. That's still weird since file-
> roller use standard command line commands to do the job and should not
> modify the original archive.

  Well, I've got the original big tarball again and have tested
several times in several ways and I'm unable to reproduce the weird
behaviour I described originally :-(

  I can confirm drag'n'drop is severely damaged, but that has already
been filed on #210235,
so I'll refrain from using it.

  I was going to downgrade severity to normal, but noticed joss has
already set it to important, but looks also like an automated email,
do you know why? (the only reason I can imagine is that tagging a RC
bug unreproducible auto-downgrades it to a non-RC level, but I wasn't
aware of that BTS procedure).

  thanks and best regards,
--
Ricardo Mones.