when will be eglibc 2.14 available

Asked by Petr Cervenka

I realized that the (e)glibc 2.13 (and older) functions memmove and memcpy are very slow on new CPUs (Intel i5,...). The new (e)glibc 2.14 solves this problem.

You can clearly see it in STRING SORT test of nbench benchmark.
The new version of glibc is almost 4 times faster on my CPU in this particular test. (2.13 cca. 260 it/s, 2.14 cca. 950 it/s)

I would like to ask when will be new version of (e)glibc 2.14 available as package(s), replacing the old version?

Also the used binutils package contain a bug which for example prevents building of the glibc:

Best regards
Petr Cervenka

Question information

English Edit question
Ubuntu eglibc Edit question
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
enubuntu (mr.tennents) said :

In oneiric will be 2.13 version:

Maybe you have to open a bug for report this.

Revision history for this message
Petr Cervenka (grugh) said :

I'm sorry for little confusion.
It seems that the performance improving patch is already included in the version 2.13.

When I try elibc 2.13 manually compiled from sources:
I get also 4 times better results than with the preinstalled eglibc-2.13 (libc6 and libc6-dev package). Although it uses the same version of source files.
I suspect that there was a mistake in settings during the compilation when package libc6 and similar were made.

My settings/building procedure was following:
../eglibc-2.13/configure --prefix=/usr/local/eglibc-2.13 --enable-add-ons --disable-profile --without-selinux --without-gd
echo "CFLAGS += -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector" > configparms
sudo make install

Will there be some new version of libc6 (and similar) package? Or could someone help me to integrate new compiled library
as the default libc in my system?

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :

If you run:

ubuntu-bug eglibc

It will start the bug reporting. You can even link this question to your bug

Revision history for this message
svens (svens) said :

try the sources from the 'source' directly :)


Revision history for this message
svens (svens) said :

Hello Petr,

If the source is working fine and you just experience a slow performance
with the ubuntu package, please just file a new bug.
This way the engineers will have all the details about the package.

Please provide as many details as possible including (if any) steps to reproduce.

Best regards.

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Petr Cervenka for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.