Comment 5 for bug 1965758
Revision history for this message
| Thomas Ward (teward) wrote Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
waveform: Paride: given this bug, wouldn't this be more suited for full SRU and rebuilds? I'm wondering whether this is truly a backportable case because this requires rebuild of all affected packages, and if anyone builds with debhelper in backports (which is NOT available in standard build envs I believe easily) that will lead to the upgrade breakage.