Till Kamppeter [2007-11-29 17:45 -0000]:
> It would be a severe failure of the release management if the official
> releases on two different platforms are of two different versions, as
> our build server usually builds packages for all platforms once a new
> source package is uploaded. And the package maintainer gets notified if
> the build server fails on a particular platform.
Indeed, and we additionally have tools which check the archive for
consistency and report such cases. We would not release in this state.
I do not know where 2.7.10 came from, that's only in hardy. Please
check your package sources if you have something like automatix or
other third-party sources.
Hi,
Till Kamppeter [2007-11-29 17:45 -0000]:
> It would be a severe failure of the release management if the official
> releases on two different platforms are of two different versions, as
> our build server usually builds packages for all platforms once a new
> source package is uploaded. And the package maintainer gets notified if
> the build server fails on a particular platform.
Indeed, and we additionally have tools which check the archive for
consistency and report such cases. We would not release in this state.
Indeed all hplip packages are in sync in 7.10:
hplip | 2.7.7.dfsg. 1-0ubuntu5 | gutsy | source, amd64, i386, powerpc 1-0ubuntu5. 1 | gutsy-proposed | source, amd64, i386, powerpc
hplip | 2.7.7.dfsg.
I do not know where 2.7.10 came from, that's only in hardy. Please
check your package sources if you have something like automatix or
other third-party sources.
Martin