Help to install driver for Brother DCP-145C, a prerequisite is "mkdir /var/spool/lpd" which returns "E: Invalid operation mkdir". 10.10 64 bit.

Asked by Franklin Percival

I am trying to install a driver for a Brother DCP-145C in 10.10 64-bit. The Brother Solutions site offers various Pre-required Procedures which I am trying to follow. PP4 states '"mkdir /var/spool/lpd" command is required if the folder does not exist.' Running this returns 'E: Invalid operation mkdir'. My command line skills are ancient and ill-remembered, but the command seems valid to me. I've been trying to get the printer to run for many hours, the graphical printer driver hunter is at a loss. Has anyone manged to install this printer in like circumstances and will be prepared to give me a hint, please?

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Ubuntu cups Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
actionparsnip
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#1

try:

sudo mkdir -p /var/spool/lpd

Then reinstall the deb

Revision history for this message
Franklin Percival (franklin-percival) said :
#2

Thanks Action Parsnip,

Looks like the directory's been created. I'll leave this open in case of further difficulties!

Revision history for this message
Franklin Percival (franklin-percival) said :
#3

Keep getting 'wrong architecture i386'. I'll give it a rest now till tomorrow.

Revision history for this message
Best actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#4

Then you have a 64bit OS but the driver is 32bit, this is one of the reasons 32bit is 'advised' on the site. You may find joy if you force install the package.

Revision history for this message
Franklin Percival (franklin-percival) said :
#5

ActionParsnip, I am too old, too ill and too tired to struggle on with the 64-bit installation, though I reckon I would have got there in the end. Installed 32-bit instead. Thanks for your time and interest. p.s. The Brother site could be more transparent!

Revision history for this message
Franklin Percival (franklin-percival) said :
#6

Thanks actionparsnip, that solved my question.

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#7