Log in / Register
Ubuntu
clang package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #599485
Comment #5
Comment 5 for bug 599485
Revision history for this message
Anton Korobeynikov (anton-korobeynikov)
wrote
on 2010-08-05
:
#5
The problem is fixed in clang mainline. So, it will definitely go into 2.8
The problem is fixed in clang mainline. So, it will definitely go into 2.8
The problem is fixed in clang mainline. So, it will definitely go into 2.8