Comment 37 for bug 948788

(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #25)
> (In reply to JeffreyDecker from comment #24)
> > I would like to take on this bug if that's alright.
>
> done, thank you btw.
>
> > Just reading through the
> > comments though it looks like it's a little unclear as to how we want to
> > refactor to fix the bug.
>
> I think go with solution from comment #21.
>
> > Has there been any decision made?
>
> Ginn, Trevor, does comment #21 approach sounds acceptable for you?

seems fine.