Comment 36 for bug 948788

(In reply to JeffreyDecker from comment #24)
> I would like to take on this bug if that's alright.

done, thank you btw.

> Just reading through the
> comments though it looks like it's a little unclear as to how we want to
> refactor to fix the bug.

I think go with solution from comment #21.

> Has there been any decision made?

Ginn, Trevor, does comment #21 approach sounds acceptable for you?