unidentified problem

Asked by Francisco Trinidad

What's this mean? and what do I need to do to resolve?

E: libgtk2.0-cil: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
E: libgnomedesktop2.20-cil: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
E: libnotify0.4-cil: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
E: librsvg2-2.18-cil: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
E: libwnck2.20-cil: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Expired
For:
Ubuntu apt Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#1

Can you give the output of:

lsb_release -a; uname -a; apt-cache policy libgtk2.0-cil:

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Francisco Trinidad (ft47) said :
#2

No command 'sb_release' found, did you mean:
 Command 'lsb_release' from package 'lsb-release' (main)
sb_release: command not found
Linux pancho-ET1331G 3.0.0-16-generic-pae #29-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 13:56:31 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
libgtk2.0-cil:
  Installed: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
pancho@pancho-ET1331G:~$

Revision history for this message
marcobra (Marco Braida) (marcobra) said :
#3

take care, the command is "lsb_release" and not "sb_release"

Please type copy back the result of:

lsb_release -crd; uname -a; apt-cache policy libgtk2.0-cil:

Revision history for this message
Francisco Trinidad (ft47) said :
#4

pancho@pancho-ET1331G:~$ lsb_release -crd; uname -a; apt-cache policy libgtk2.0-cil
Description: Ubuntu 11.10
Release: 11.10
Codename: oneiric
Linux pancho-ET1331G 3.0.0-16-generic-pae #29-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 13:56:31 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
libgtk2.0-cil:
  Installed: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
pancho@pancho-ET1331G:~$

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Francisco Trinidad (ft47) said :
#5

pancho@pancho-ET1331G:~$ lsb_release -a; uname -a; apt-cache policy libgtk2.0-cil:
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 11.10
Release: 11.10
Codename: oneiric
Linux pancho-ET1331G 3.0.0-16-generic-pae #29-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 13:56:31 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
libgtk2.0-cil:
  Installed: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
pancho@pancho-ET1331G:~$

Thanks

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#6

I suggest you report a bug

Revision history for this message
Francisco Trinidad (ft47) said :
#7

How can I do that?

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#8

Run:

ubuntu-bug libgtk2.0-cil

Revision history for this message
Francisco Trinidad (ft47) said :
#9

Thank you

________________________________
 From: actionparsnip <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Question #193825]: unidentified problem

Your question #193825 on apt in Ubuntu changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/193825

actionparsnip proposed the following answer:
Run:

ubuntu-bug libgtk2.0-cil

--
If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
know that it is solved:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/193825/+confirm?answer_id=7

If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
following page to enter your feedback:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/193825

You received this question notification because you asked the question.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said :
#10

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.