EU General Data Protection Regulation

Asked by Tim Ritberg

How will Ubuntu comply to the new General Data Protection Regulation in EU?

I see problems with finger and last on servers. You can't restrict the output to filter foreing entries.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
Ubuntu Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#1

If you use a firewall you can block the finger port. Ubuntu comes with iptables by default

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#2

Is wrote finger not fingerd!

Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#3

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/finger-1.37/html_chapter/finger_3.html

Disable fingering a specific user by linking /home/foo/.finger control to /bin/true

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#4

this config is for fingerd! this has no effect on localhost!

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#5

What about uninstalling fínger client / fingerd demon?

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#6

for local use there is not fingerd required and finger information should be visible for root and user itself.
what about last?

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#7

Disclaimer: This is my personal view to the GDPR matters.

I do not see a reason that GDPR would disallow the use of utilities like finger and last. (Remark: also commands like "who" or "ps ax" can display user names).

"Ubuntu" need not comply to GDPR. Each computer and data service provider has to, and e.g. Canonical Ltd. is subject to the new regulation.

What you have to guarantee as a service provider is that users have agreed to terms of use, and in these terms you can state that their login history etc. could be visible to others.

Or you disable all these commands (either by uninstalling them or by limiting access to specific privileged groups).

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#8

Software publisher has to make their software comply to "Privacy by design" und "Privacy by default“.

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#9

btw GDPR does not allow to avoid law with terms of use. (Art. 7 GDPR)

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#10

 "Privacy by default“: finger is not part of a default Ubuntu installation.

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#11

Are you sure? But last, who and ps is there.
As I remember correctly, Windows is restricting those imformation.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said :
#12

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#13

Very bad support for this problem. I think usage of Linux wil not be possible in EU.

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#14

What kind of answer do you expect to receive?

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#15

A response of someone, who is in charge, that Ubuntu will comply with this laws at a certain date.

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#16

I can only repeat:
It depends on the use of an operating system, whether you are in compliance with the GDPR regulations or not.

By using the best and most secure operating system in the wrong way, you will break the GDPR rules.

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#17

Yes. And why do not want Ubuntu to change this few programs to comply to law?

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said :
#18

If you can make a proposal how to change the programs in question such that they can ensure GDPR compliance, then please create bug reports.

By the way, I still do not see any problem with finger, last and similar programs, because the information that you get is only the username which is a pseudonym that cannot be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. (Art. 4 item 5, Art. 6, Art. 25, Art. 32)

Revision history for this message
Tim Ritberg (xpert-reactos) said :
#19

On many systems, finger show the real name. And a username is not always a pseudonym. BTW GDPR count a pseudonym as private data, bechause it could like to other data which will show the real user.

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Tim Ritberg for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.