Ubuntu

Ubuntu 14.04 - Dependency is not satisfiable: lib gnome vfs 2.0 while installing aptoncd_0.1.98+bzr117-1.4_all.deb

Asked by Rossco

I have a remote desktop with a fresh install of ubuntu 14.04, I want to install aptoncd so I can install updates, upgrades and other software from my laptop with the same ubuntu 14.04, which can be connected to the internet at my work place. I down loaded the package aptoncd_0.1.98+bzr117-1.4_all.deb from http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package/core/trusty/universe/base/aptoncd, and tried to install the package, then software centre opened up and displayed the following: Dependency is not satisfiable: lib gnome vfs 2.0, Error. This has prevented me from installing aptoncd, and consiquently anything else. I have googled for information and found a bug report at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706110, but I still don't know what to do to get aptoncd installed.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Ubuntu Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
actionparsnip
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Rossco (wudgulah) said : 		#1

Both my desktop and laptop are 64bit

Revision history for this message
Best actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said : 		#2

If you copy the debs from the online system to the offline one it will be ok. The debs are in /var/cache/apt/archives

Revision history for this message
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) said : 		#3

Please provide the full output of the terminal commands

uname -a
lsb_release -a
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install aptoncd

Revision history for this message
Rossco (wudgulah) said : 		#4

Hi, thanks guys for your replies, I took actionparsnip's advise and copied the archive packages from a fresh install on virtualbox, so I would gain only Aptoncd and its dependancies, copied them to a folder in my home folder and ran the following terminal command:

sudo dpkg -i /home/me/folder/*.deb

This installed Aptoncd and all dependancies perfectly
I only have an issue installing "hal" now to restore the .iso it makes, but I'll ask that in another question.

Thanks again

Revision history for this message
Rossco (wudgulah) said : 		#5

Thanks actionparsnip, that solved my question.