Ubuntu's blueprints are a mess

Asked by Grzegorz G.

Someone should clean blueprints a bit. For example I found one from 2007 (!) about dialog that pops up on opening .exe files and explains the situation. This is a very good idea. Why isn't it implemented or even reviewed? And if it's declined or old (5 years without any comment!), it should be deleted. There even is a blueprint marked for Feisty! If it's still actual it should be marked for Precise or Quantal, and if not - deleted.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Ubuntu Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Sam_
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
actionparsnip (andrew-woodhead666) said :
#1

I suggest you report a bug

Revision history for this message
Grzegorz G. (grzesiek1e5) said :
#2

Against which package?

Revision history for this message
Best Sam_ (and-sam) said :
#3

Please provide links of blueprints. Usually there is approver, drafter, assignee and subscribers, maybe contact them.

The idea to delete outdated blueprints sounds marvelous (similar to clean-up wrong documentation).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=IT1yY78J9A0

Maybe ask the question there and admins may suggest how to proceed.
https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion

Revision history for this message
Grzegorz G. (grzesiek1e5) said :
#4

Thanks Sam_, that solved my question.

Revision history for this message
Grzegorz G. (grzesiek1e5) said :
#5

I registered blueprint about cleaning up blueprints (blueprintception, lol) and requested feedback from Ubuntu Documentation Project Team.

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/clean-blueprints

Revision history for this message
Sam_ (and-sam) said :
#6

4006 blueprints having distro tags and milestones of EOLs feisty, gutsy, intrepid ...
It might be up to drafters to take on the janitor role. We'll see.

Revision history for this message
Grzegorz G. (grzesiek1e5) said :
#7