systemback as a performing tool ?

Asked by frank

Today i performed Systemback to copy a system into a different partition in order to maintain an old Ubuntu 10.04 LL, I still, rarely use, but want to keep for the stability and the deep personalization I made along the years.

The space taken in the original partition of the system, ran on ssd (previously cleaned by UbuntuTweak) was 19 GB and I expected the same in the destination partition.

I was surprized the new space taken was 7.6 GB without user data file, and 11.7 GB with the user data file (Gnome monitor system results).
In the first instance, some nomatter file/directory, on the desktop and /home/user were kept too.
In the second instance, apparently the system is the perfect copy of the source, as it has to be and finally, the system run quite more fast and quick too, at least by an eye look.

So I would ask if this behavior is full trusting, and this use could be suggested regularly for improving performance?
I used "system copy", can I expect the same behavior for "system restore" too? I used 0.7.7.501_01.08.2014-gtk+

Many times I ran Systemback for live system and iso for redistribute Ubuntu 12.04-14.04 with great satisfaction.
Hope not to be to much --v (verbose), want to thank for this wonderful software.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Systemback Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Kendek
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Best Kendek (nemh) said :
#1

Systemback is excluding (or emptying) some system files when copying system or creating restore point.
Example, the downloaded .deb files or logs are taking lot of space (up to several gigabytes). But there is no need to worry, these files are created dynamically. But over time, the system size will increase again. And yes, if you perform a system restoration, the system size is reduced again.

Revision history for this message
frank (bookmark04) said :
#2

thanks!