[1.1.4]Is the masked pattern valid for findAll()?

LOL, you are my best tester ;-)

right, findAll with mask patterna does not yet work.

I make it a bug, since I found additionally, that the mask handling can be a bit easier.
So it takes a bit more time.

Thanks a lot.

Thanks RaiMan, that solved my question.

Evidence of executing the script
https://photos.app.goo.gl/GWdQLLnfFbRpwEfB6

The result of code 4 is not what I expected.

please send me the images and a screenshot of the relevant part.

Mail: sikulix---at---outlook---dot---com

BTW:
- added a simpler .mask() and .mask(ImageOrPattern) (see docs)

- there is a findAllList():

matches = findAllList(image)
for match in matches:
    match.highlight(1)

I'm sorry, I did not notice that the document was changed. asMask and withMask are removed from the document and there is only mask. So I will use mask from now on.

No need to be sorry.

Sometimes the docs tell you nothing about something and then they change without notice ;-)

In this case, the first solution (asMask/withMask) was a bit too detailed and not really straight forward.
So I made it a bit more convenient.

Thanks for your continuous contributions.

BTW: I would like to use your example with the map and cones as a more general example for the docs.

Is that ok?

>#8
Please use it.

>#9
I confirmed it worked.

Thanks RaiMan, that solved my question.