SikuliX

Project names confusion

Asked by Eugene S

Hi RaiMan,

It seems that I am bit confused about the Sikuli project names. I thought I understand how they are organized but after going through some of the questions I am not longer sure.

Please find my questions below:

1. So we have this Sikuli API project:
https://code.google.com/p/sikuli-api/

As far as I understand, this one has nothing to do with you and is a completely separate project. Is that correct?

2. Then we have this SikuliX API project:
https://github.com/RaiMan/SikuliX-2014/tree/master/API

That actually IS your project that you support.

3. In the above mentioned github, you have multiple modules, one of them is API.
So if I want to use the code for testing (similarly as I am using sikuli script with jython), which one of these modules should I use. I see 2 options there: API or Libswin.

4. If I create new project from scratch and I want to add Sikuli script dependency in my pom.xml, what artefact/groupID should i use? I found few references in the documentation and ended up using some combination of these. Can you please specify what is the correct pom configuration?

Thanks in advance!!
Eugene S

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Expired
For:
SikuliX Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
RaiMan (raimund-hocke) said : 		#1

at http://sikulix.com:

not far from top ;-)

sikulixapi.jar is half way up to Maven Central
SNAPSHOTS available on OSSRH (admin: oss.sonatype.org)

The repository URL:
<url>http://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/public</url>

The coordinates:
<groupId>com.sikulix</groupId>
<artifactId>sikulixapi</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>

Revision history for this message
RaiMan (raimund-hocke) said : 		#2

... and yes:
the https://code.google.com/p/sikuli-api/

is somewhat feature compatible (one of the original developers TomYeh) but not compatible at tenJava API level.

So it has nothing to do with my work and I do not support it.

Revision history for this message
Eugene S (shragovich) said : 		#3

Thank you for your answers RaiMan!

Yes, I am aware of these coordinates that you mentioned. Just wanted to make sure that's the only artefact that is required. On few occasions it didn't work for me straight away, that's why I am asking.

Thanks again,
Eugene

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said : 		#4

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.