Onboard

  1. Bug #1032042
  2. Comment #2

Comment 2 for bug 1032042

Revision history for this message
Gabriel C. Stabel (gstabel) wrote :

Hi marmuta.
Before I read this comments I would suggest to capture SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 (like you did with SIGTERM) to implement show and hide capabilities (and maybe others).
But problably using g_application way is better (despite the bug you found).