> Maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I really don't want to install
> hundreds of 32-bit libraries just because of nswrapperplugin.
No sane person wants to install hundreds of 32bit libraries. Anyway,
you need only a few of them, not hundreds, but I don't know, which
libraries are really necessary for nspluginwrapper + Flash plugin.
> I'm sure
> it has been considered already, but at least for the Grooveshark
> service, why don't you temporarily use http://html5.grooveshark.com/
> (this could be optional in the settings, or a fallback)
It might be possible to use html5.grooveshark.com, but Grooveshark
service integration is currently orphaned (bug #1035487), ie. a new
maintainer is needed for this task.
P.S. You can contact support of Grooveshark to suggest using HTML5
also for www.grooveshark.com.
> Maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I really don't want to install
> hundreds of 32-bit libraries just because of nswrapperplugin.
No sane person wants to install hundreds of 32bit libraries. Anyway,
you need only a few of them, not hundreds, but I don't know, which
libraries are really necessary for nspluginwrapper + Flash plugin.
> I'm sure html5.groovesha rk.com/
> it has been considered already, but at least for the Grooveshark
> service, why don't you temporarily use http://
> (this could be optional in the settings, or a fallback)
It might be possible to use html5.groovesha rk.com, but Grooveshark
service integration is currently orphaned (bug #1035487), ie. a new
maintainer is needed for this task.
P.S. You can contact support of Grooveshark to suggest using HTML5 .com.
also for www.grooveshark