Confusion over the correct syntax to generate process
Asked by
Saumyen Kundu
Hi,
Excuse me for this trivial (and potentially silly question).
I am bit confused while generating the process " p p -> w w j ". I tried 2 syntaxes.
1. generate p p > w+ w- j, (w+ > l+ vl), (w- > j j) @1
add process p p > w+ w- j, (w- > l- vl~), (w+ > j j) @2
This gives: 2 processes with 176 diagrams
2. define ww = w+ w-; define l = l+ l-; define vll = vl vl~
generate p p > ww ww j, (ww > l vll), (ww > j j)
This gives: 1 processes with 92 diagrams
I just wanted to know which one would be correct to use? Using the 2nd syntax, would I miss out on contributing diagrams or syntax-1 double counts some diagrams.
Thanks a lot for any help in advance.
With regards,
Saumyen
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Saumyen Kundu
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply:
To post a message you must log in.