model_v4 not running
Dear MG team,
I am facing a trouble when using model_v4, generating events (with MGv265).
It works fine up to the part where I modify the runcards but it eventually fails when it tries to generate the events with it.
Other model_v4 works fine so would it be problem from the model card itself?
https:/
https:/
These are the two model files I tested and the one above is failing event generation while other is totally fine.
Regards,
Sihyun.
generate_events run_01
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/data9/
return self.onecmd_
File "/data9/
return func(arg, **opt)
File "/data9/
self.
File "/data9/
original_
File "/data9/
postcmd=False)
File "/data9/
stop = Cmd.onecmd_
File "/data9/
return func(arg, **opt)
File "/data9/
self.
File "/data9/
self.
File "/data9/
return misc.compile(
File "/data9/
raise MadGraph5Error, error_text
MadGraph5Error: A compilation Error occurs when trying to compile /data9/
The compilation fails with the following output message:
/cvmfs/
cd MODEL; make
make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add '+' to parent make rule.
make[1]: Entering directory '/data9/
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/data9/
/cvmfs/
setrun.o: In function `setrun_':
setrun.
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile:62: recipe for target '../bin/
make: *** [../bin/
Please try to fix this compilations issue and retry.
Help might be found at https:/
If you think that this is a bug, you can report this at https:/
automatic_
cluster_
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Olivier Mattelaer
- Solved:
- 2020-12-21
- Last query:
- 2020-12-21
- Last reply:
- 2020-12-15
Hi,
I actually reproduce the error, it seems that the makefile of this model_v4 need to be updated.
In my case I have the following error message:
ld: warning: ignoring file ../../lib/
This is not too surprising since makefile of v4 model are static and does not use the flag/... of the rest of the code so it is likely to create issue.
However this does not seem to be exactly your issue since in my case I have such issue for both model.
Don't you have the same model available in the UFO format?
Cheers,
Olivier
Sihyun Jeon (shjeon) said : | #2 |
I found it working at least in MGv260.
But indeed this should be updated (not sure whether UFO is there for us).
Thank you!
Sihyun Jeon (shjeon) said : | #3 |
Thanks Olivier Mattelaer, that solved my question.