MadSpin does not decay both leptons in NLO tt̄ -> SS2L Channel in HeavyN Model
Dear MG Experts,
I am a first time MG user who is trying to generate some NLO tt̄ events and decay them into SS2L channel using HeavyN [1] Model.
The process I want to achieve is (See Feynman diagram on Fig.1 in [2])
t -> b W+ (W+ -> N mu+) (N -> mu+ W*) (W* -> q q')
tbar -> bW
with mN < mW.
Since I want NLO level events, I separate the work into two steps:
1) Generate tt̄ events with Proc_card, I do:
=======
import model SM_HeavyN_NLO
define p = g u c d s u~ c~ d~ s~
define j = g u c d s u~ c~ d~ s~
define n = n1 n2 n3
generate p p > t t~ [QCD]
=======
2) In a second step I want to decay these top quarks using MadSpin:
I decay top products subsequently and tbar as usual.
APPROACH 1
=======
decay t > b w+
decay w+ > n mu+
decay n > mu+ w-
decay w- > j j
decay t~ > b~ w-, w- > j j
=======
When I check, I come across the problem that I am having only one muon, the muon that is supposed to be coming from n does not happen. Having read a bit more I found out that X > Y Z format enforces on-shell decay of particles. So I believe since mN<mW the decay of n is not working here?
The tutorials suggest using multi-body decay that does not enforce on-shell, but then MS cannot calculate everything perfectly so one needs to use the option "set spinmode none" So I did the following as a test:
APPROACH 2
=======
set spinmode none
decay t > b mu+ mu+ j j
decay t~ > b~ w-, w- > j j
=======
This now gives lot of SS2L events with reasonable plots. However I am not sure if decays here do take place through the decay chain I wish to happen? I want to somehow make sure that the decay chain follows from Majorana particle n. I then thought of this following approach:
APPROACH 3
=======
set spinmode none
decay t > b w+
decay w+ > mu+ n
decay n > mu+ j j (Idea is that multi-body decay here should account for off-shellness of W*)
decay t~ > b~ w-, w- > j j
=======
However this again does not give 2 mu+. My question is whether APPROACH 2 is already the correct way and if not is there way to make an APPROACH 3 like syntax work?
Thank you in advance!
Cheers,
Ogul
Setup: OTF production on LXPLUS using MG5aMC@NLO 2.6.7
[1] http://
[2] https:/
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Olivier Mattelaer
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply: