DECAY block in param card and info on interaction orders
Dear authors,
I have two independent questions:
1. I was wondering in what cases the DECAY block is compulsory for a param_card to be considered valid.
I have a model where this is absent, because decay widths are all defined as internal parameters.
generating events does not give any issue, but I noticed that the reweighting works only if the parameters values are changed with "set frblock 1 1 " etc. while if I pass the path of a param_card as an argument, it is not accepted and the reweighting returns zero cross section.
I have checked that indeed inserting a dummy DECAY block in the imported param_card fixes the issue, but I'd like to know if there are other cases where this can be problematic.
2. is there any reference where I can find an exhaustive description of all the allowed (and not allowed) interaction order specifications and their interplay with the syntax for the definitions of processes? I figured some of this empirically (eg NP==1 does is not accepted together with a comma that splits a process in production+decay) but I couldn't find anything 'official' about it.
Thank you very much!
Ilaria
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Ilaria Brivio
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply: