An issue of MadGraph when calculating neutrino cross sections
Dear MadGraph experts,
It seems that I noticed a common issue of MadGraph when calculating neutrino cross sections.
Following the discussion on https:/
The DIS is complicated. So then I've tried several processes between neutrinos and elementary particles. Surprisingly, I found MadGraph's results is usually ~half of standard value.
First,
I've tried the ve e- > ve e-. The xsec from MadGraph is very close to 1/1.5 of standard value, and the shape is slightly different at lowest energies.
For the runcards, I set e- to be at rest and removed all the cuts:
set lpp1 0
set lpp2 0
set ebeam1 0.
set no_parton_cut
Second,
I've tried vm e- > ve m-. The xsec from MadGraph is very close to 1/2 of standard value, the shape is slight different near threshold.
(The standard value should be sigma = GF^2*s/pi*(1- m_mu^2/s), where s = 2*Eν*m_e for electron at rest. )
For the runcards, same settings as above.
Third,
I've tried ve a > e- W+. The xsec from MadGraph is very close to 1/2 of standard value, in https:/
For the runcards,
set lpp1 0
set lpp2 0
set ebeam1 0.25
set no_parton_cut
(Here I set photon energy to be 0.25 GeV just for convenience because the value of s will be same as that of ebeam2.)
So any possible explanation for above? Since the difference is usually very close to 1/2 of standard value, maybe it's because MadGraph did a helicity average, 1/2, to neutrino (but neutrino should only have one helicity)? Or maybe there are some remaining cuts I didn't remove after "set no_parton_cut"?
Thanks so much!
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Qiji Xin
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply: