MadGraph5_aMC@NLO

Syntax for two subsequent decays

Asked by Maksym Ovchynnikov

I want to simulate the process p p > w+, then w+ > n1 ta+, then n1 > mu+ mu- vt and ta+ > mu+ vm vt~,

where n1 is some new particle. Could you please tell me what is the correct syntax for the process? Is the following syntax correct?

p p > w+, (w+ > n1 ta+, (n1 > mu+ mu- vt , ta+ > mu+ vm vt~))

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Olivier Mattelaer
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Best Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said : 		#1

Yes this is correct.

Please check the Feynman diagram (the one generated AFTER the output command contains the full decay)

Cheers,

Olivier

Revision history for this message
Maksym Ovchynnikov (name-xxx) said : 		#2

Thanks Olivier Mattelaer, that solved my question.