Loop problems: Cluster Error detected.

Asked by tom ingebretsen carlson

Hi!

I'm trying to generate a BSM process with a loop. p p > scalar scalar

The model works on other machines, but i'm getting the following error:

INFO: Update the dependent parameter of the param_card.dat
Generating 10000 events with run name run_01
survey run_01
INFO: compile directory
compile Source Directory
Using random number seed offset = 27
INFO: Running Survey
Creating Jobs
Working on SubProcesses
INFO: P0_gg_rsdmrsdm
INFO: Idle: 2, Running: 0, Completed: 0 [ current time: 15h39 ]
STOP 3
rm: cannot remove 'results.dat': No such file or directory
ERROR DETECTED
INFO: Idle: 0, Running: 1, Completed: 1 [ 0.17s ]
STOP 3
rm: cannot remove 'results.dat': No such file or directory
ERROR DETECTED
Error when reading <open file '/home/tom/Software/MG5_aMC_v2.6.4/MG5_aMC_v2_6_4/TestQCD5/SubProcesses/P0_gg_rsdmrsdm/G1_1/results.dat', mode 'r' at 0x7fa2c98c20c0>
WARNING: need more than 5 values to unpack
INFO: Idle: 0, Running: 0, Completed: 3 [ 0.24s ]
need more than 5 values to unpack
Cluster Error detected. Do you want to clean the queue? ("c"=continue the run anyway) [y, n, c][60s to answer]
>
use y
Command "generate_events run_01" interrupted with error:
ValueError : need more than 5 values to unpack
Please report this bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo
More information is found in '/home/tom/Software/MG5_aMC_v2.6.4/MG5_aMC_v2_6_4/TestQCD5/run_01_tag_1_debug.log'.
Please attach this file to your report.

How do I fix this bug?

Thanks alot for the help!

Cheers

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
tom ingebretsen carlson
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#1

Hi,

This bug is solved in 2.6.5, even if we still faced some particular case that were still crashing in 2.6.5.
In that case, you might want to try the development version (future 2.6.6)

A work around is to change the dynamical scale (to either fix scale or to another dynamical scale)

Cheers,

Olivier

Revision history for this message
tom ingebretsen carlson (makronymen) said :
#2

Hi,

Thanks! Changing the dynamical scale seems to work. I'm currently using the version 2.6.4.

Cheers,

Tom